Comparison Overview

Heaford

VS

Association for PRINT Technologies

Heaford

9 Century Park, Altrincham, WA14 5BJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jmheaford.com

Experts in Prepress Efficiency Heaford is a global supplier of high-quality mounting and proofing machines and auxiliary equipment dedicated to improving prepress efficiency and productivity in the Flexo and Gravure industries. Fully supported by an international network of agents and service partners, our pioneering products provide reliability and confidence for leading print converters. Established in 1982 in Manchester, UK, we are a privately owned progressive business built on strong family values and integrity. From traditional mounters for start-ups, to innovative solutions for multi-press installations, Heaford supports global flexo converters of every size with a product range that is the most diverse in the industry. We’ve sold over 5000 machines to over 100 countries. Around 70% of sales are to repeat customers. Every Heaford product is manufactured in the UK at our Manchester site.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Association for PRINT Technologies

450 10th Circle N , None, Nashville, TN, US, 37203
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://PrintTechnologies.org

APTech is a member-driven association that along with its independent subsidiary, WhatTheyThink, is a premier source of print industry news and analysis; media production; specialty events; and educational content on all facets of today’s print industry. APTech is ANSI-accredited to support national and international standards development for the print industry, including ICC, B65, CGATS and USTAG. For complete information about the Association, its programs, and its member companies, visit: https://PrintTechnologies.org or phone: 703/264-7200.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jmheafordlimited.jpeg
Heaford
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-print-technologies.jpeg
Association for PRINT Technologies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Heaford
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Association for PRINT Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heaford in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Association for PRINT Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — Heaford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heaford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Association for PRINT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Association for PRINT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jmheafordlimited.jpeg
Heaford
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/association-for-print-technologies.jpeg
Association for PRINT Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Association for PRINT Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Heaford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Association for PRINT Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Heaford company.

In the current year, Association for PRINT Technologies company and Heaford company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Heaford company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Heaford company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Association for PRINT Technologies company nor Heaford company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Heaford company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Heaford company nor Association for PRINT Technologies company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Association for PRINT Technologies company employs more people globally than Heaford company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Heaford nor Association for PRINT Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References