Comparison Overview

Heaford

VS

Artistic Imprints

Heaford

9 Century Park, Altrincham, WA14 5BJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Experts in Prepress Efficiency Heaford is a global supplier of high-quality mounting and proofing machines and auxiliary equipment dedicated to improving prepress efficiency and productivity in the Flexo and Gravure industries. Fully supported by an international network of agents and service partners, our pioneering products provide reliability and confidence for leading print converters. Established in 1982 in Manchester, UK, we are a privately owned progressive business built on strong family values and integrity. From traditional mounters for start-ups, to innovative solutions for multi-press installations, Heaford supports global flexo converters of every size with a product range that is the most diverse in the industry. We’ve sold over 5000 machines to over 100 countries. Around 70% of sales are to repeat customers. Every Heaford product is manufactured in the UK at our Manchester site.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Artistic Imprints

823 Saint Johns Rd., Camp Hill, PA, US, 17011
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Artistic Imprints is a full-service printing and decorating company, offering screen printing & embroidery, promotional products, signage & banners, and marketing material. In a nutshell- most anything your logo goes on, we can do for you. Our goal is to enhance your image & grow your brand. We can help move your image forward in a positive way. Artistic Imprints started in 2005 with the Customer as our number one priorty. Our goal is simple- provide top notch, quality products with a quick turn around on all orders, at reasonable prices. We truly are a one-stop shop for getting your brand out there.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jmheafordlimited.jpeg
Heaford
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artistic-imprints.jpeg
Artistic Imprints
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Heaford
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Artistic Imprints
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heaford in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Artistic Imprints in 2025.

Incident History — Heaford (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heaford cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Artistic Imprints (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Artistic Imprints cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jmheafordlimited.jpeg
Heaford
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artistic-imprints.jpeg
Artistic Imprints
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Artistic Imprints company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Heaford company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Artistic Imprints company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Heaford company.

In the current year, Artistic Imprints company and Heaford company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Artistic Imprints company nor Heaford company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Artistic Imprints company nor Heaford company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Artistic Imprints company nor Heaford company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Heaford company nor Artistic Imprints company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Heaford company nor Artistic Imprints company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Heaford company employs more people globally than Artistic Imprints company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Heaford nor Artistic Imprints holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N