Comparison Overview

JM MARINE, LLC

VS

Little Feet

JM MARINE, LLC

19450 Peachland Blvd, Port Charlotte, Florida, 33948, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

JM Marine is dedicated to the Old Fashioned principals of Integrity, Honesty and Trust. Serving the greater Charlotte, Lee, Desoto and Sarasota Coounties. Service is our key role in the Marine Industry, Sales and Parts are also important aspects of our business. Authorized Dealer for Hunter Trailerable Sailboats, Hobie Sailboats, WindRider Sailboats, Tohatsu Outboards, Torqeedo Outboards, Future Beach Kayaks, Tiki Water Sports, and Service Center for Lehr Outboards.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Little Feet

Newport Beach, 92663, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

"Little Feet/Big Goals" Little Feet gives underprivileged children the chance to enjoy the game of soccer by providing them with new, high-quality soccer balls. Founded upon the “one for one” model, we donate a ball to a needy child for each one sold. Since 2006 we have shared our passion for soccer with children and schools in over 40 countries worldwide. Promoting peace through soccer. Little Feet/Big Goals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jm-marine-llc.jpeg
JM MARINE, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-feet.jpeg
Little Feet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JM MARINE, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Little Feet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JM MARINE, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Little Feet in 2025.

Incident History — JM MARINE, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JM MARINE, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Little Feet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Little Feet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jm-marine-llc.jpeg
JM MARINE, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/little-feet.jpeg
Little Feet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Little Feet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JM MARINE, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Little Feet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JM MARINE, LLC company.

In the current year, Little Feet company and JM MARINE, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Little Feet company nor JM MARINE, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Little Feet company nor JM MARINE, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Little Feet company nor JM MARINE, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC company nor Little Feet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC company nor Little Feet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Little Feet company employs more people globally than JM MARINE, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JM MARINE, LLC nor Little Feet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H