Comparison Overview

JLKare & Support

VS

Harvest Healthcare

JLKare & Support

Unit 7-8 West Cross Shopping Centre, Smethwick, B66 1JG, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 800 and 849

Vision Our vision is one of equality, a chance for life with meaning. Mission Statement JLKare and Support Limited aim to provide a person centred approach and ensure that people have choice and control of their own lives and where people are valued as members of their local communities. Aims and Objectives Our business is led by Directors whose values are simply wanting to make a difference, with expert knowledge of the Health and Social Care Sector. We aim to provide a safe, effective and reliable service in a person centred way, recognising individuals’ rights and choices. We aim to provide a safe service where people are protected from abuse and staff respect the clients’ human rights. We aim to maximise choice, control and independence for the people we support. We aim to ensure people are treated with respect and dignity at all times. The people we support will be at the heart of what we do. We aim to have a “can do” attitude and will support people to maximise their potential and wellbeing. We aim to select staff who are caring, compassionate and competent with a good value base, and will promote continual professional development. We aim to ensure clients are encouraged to take controlled risks whilst recognising individual’s rights and choices. We aim to treat people with privacy, dignity and respect at all times and involve them in how the service is run. We aim to ensure people are aware of their human rights whilst promoting equality and inclusion. Our objective is the provision of a high quality professional organisation that is committed to assisting the clients to maintain his/her quality of life and to remain in their own homes for as long as possible, and as long as it’s in the clients own interests.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Harvest Healthcare

21 Waterville Rd, Avon, CT, 06001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Harvest Healthcare is a leading full-service behavioral health provider, specializing in the delivery of progressive and innovative consultative behavioral health services to patients residing in skilled nursing, rehabilitation, and assisted living facilities. Our team is comprised of the region's leading behavioral health professionals who have been hand selected based on their experience, education and commitment to the highest standards of practice. Harvest is Connecticut’s fastest growing and most progressive behavioral health consulting company. At Harvest, we recognize that success begins with caring. Our approach is personal, relationship based and collaborative. Our mission is to cultivate a true partnership with your staff to provide the best possible treatment for your residents, patients and families. The Harvest Difference: We are committed to redefining and setting the standard of excellence in behavioral health care through programs that combine sound educational principles with the most recent advancements in neuropsychological research. Harvest provides a full-spectrum of services designed to support the needs of our patients, families and caregivers.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jlkare-&-support.jpeg
JLKare & Support
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvest-healthcare.jpeg
Harvest Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JLKare & Support
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harvest Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JLKare & Support in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvest Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — JLKare & Support (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLKare & Support cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harvest Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harvest Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jlkare-&-support.jpeg
JLKare & Support
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvest-healthcare.jpeg
Harvest Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JLKare & Support company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harvest Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Harvest Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JLKare & Support company.

In the current year, Harvest Healthcare company and JLKare & Support company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harvest Healthcare company nor JLKare & Support company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Harvest Healthcare company nor JLKare & Support company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Harvest Healthcare company nor JLKare & Support company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JLKare & Support company nor Harvest Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JLKare & Support company nor Harvest Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Harvest Healthcare company employs more people globally than JLKare & Support company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JLKare & Support nor Harvest Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N