Comparison Overview

JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd

VS

Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc.

JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd

JGC House, Janetstown, Thurso, Caithness, GB, KW14 7XF
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

JGC is one of the UK's leading engineering companies with the breadth and depth of technical expertise to respond to the daily complex challenges of major engineering projects. We have the skills, knowledge and proven experience to plan, design, manufacture and implement the solutions to complete the project. JGC provide exceptional service, quality products and have the detailed knowledge required to make your engineering projects successful. We have grown the business beyond local engineering services to a respected national and international manufacturer and supplier of quality assured engineering services. Building on our skills in mechanical, electrical, controls and instrumentation allows us to meet the needs of today’s nuclear, energy and utilities markets and their demands for tomorrow. JGC offer innovative engineering solutions and high quality delivery to a wide variety of market sectors. Our commitment to our people is fundamental to us as a family business. We believe in attracting, developing and retaining a strong workforce and our continued success is underpinned by our commitment to investment in skills and training. One company with all the right skills – JGC offer a multi disciplined solution to a variety of market sectors. We employ people that reflect the core values of the company. Our aim is to develop their skills, expertise and work ethic to ensure that we can deliver successful engineering projects time and time again.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc.

460 Commerce Street, Lake Crystal, Minnesota, 56055, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Industrial Fabrication Services (I.F.S.) in Lake Crystal, Minnesota is a custom metal fabrication facility that builds metal components for many bulk material handling industries. Currently, I.F.S. employs about 100 people in a 75,000 square foot facility. I.F.S. is located 12 miles southwest of Mankato, Minnesota, just off of Highway 60, in the Lake Crystal Industrial Park. From this location I.F.S. ships products throughout the continental U.S.A., Canada, Mexico and sometimes worldwide. I.F.S. works primarily with general contractors, custom equipment manufacturers, mining companies, agricultural processors, and power generation facilities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jgc-engineering-and-technical-services.jpeg
JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifs-steel-fab.jpeg
Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jgc-engineering-and-technical-services.jpeg
JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifs-steel-fab.jpeg
Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company.

In the current year, Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company and JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company nor JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company nor JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company nor JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd company employs more people globally than Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JGC Engineering and Technical Services Ltd nor Industrial Fabrication Services, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H