Comparison Overview

Jewish Museum of Australia

VS

Historic New England

Jewish Museum of Australia

26 Alma Road, ST KILDA, VIC, AU, 3182
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jewishmuseum.com.au

The Jewish Museum of Australia is a community museum, which aims to explore and share the Jewish experience in Australia and benefit Australia's diverse society. The Jewish Museum of Australia is committed to being a respected and innovative cultural centre, recognised nationally for its excellence in exhibitions, education programs and collection management.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Historic New England

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.historicnewengland.org/

Historic New England is the oldest and largest regional heritage organization in the nation. We engage diverse audiences in developing a deeper understanding and enjoyment of New England home life by being the national leader in collecting, preserving, and using significant buildings, landscapes, archives, stories, and objects from the past to today.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-museum-of-australia.jpeg
Jewish Museum of Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-new-england.jpeg
Historic New England
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jewish Museum of Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic New England
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jewish Museum of Australia in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic New England in 2026.

Incident History — Jewish Museum of Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jewish Museum of Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic New England (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic New England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-museum-of-australia.jpeg
Jewish Museum of Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-new-england.jpeg
Historic New England
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Historic New England company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jewish Museum of Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Historic New England company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jewish Museum of Australia company.

In the current year, Historic New England company and Jewish Museum of Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic New England company nor Jewish Museum of Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic New England company nor Jewish Museum of Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic New England company nor Jewish Museum of Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia company nor Historic New England company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia company nor Historic New England company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Historic New England company employs more people globally than Jewish Museum of Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jewish Museum of Australia nor Historic New England holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References