Comparison Overview

Jewish Museum London

VS

Tulsa Garden Center

Jewish Museum London

Raymond Burton House, London, NW1 7NB, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jewishmuseum.org.uk/

The Jewish Museum London is a landmark Museum that celebrates Jewish life and cultural diversity. Our education programmes and activities encourage a sense of discovery and creativity and tell the story of Jewish history, culture and religion in an innovative and compelling way and engage with people of all backgrounds and faiths to explore Jewish heritage and identity as part of the wider story of Britain. The only museum in London dedicated to a minority group, we aspire to continue to build interfaith understanding, inspiring people to take a stand against racism and to look at the world from a different point of view.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tulsa Garden Center

undefined, Tulsa, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tulsagardencenter.org

Tulsa Garden Center, located in historic Woodward Park, is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to provide a variety of horticultural and environmental education opportunities for the community and to serve as horticultural headquarters for the Tulsa area. A primary goal is to promote learning about plants through educational and recreational programs, while preserving the heritage of its historic building. Tulsa Garden Center fulfills its role as part of a larger botanical community by advocating responsible stewardship of plants and their habitats and frequently sponsors lectures, classes, shows and special events. Nearly 30 affiliated organizations call Tulsa Garden Center home for horticultural and environmental activities. The Center is open to the public with no admission charge on Tuesday - Saturday, 9:00 am until 4:00pm.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-museum-london.jpeg
Jewish Museum London
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-garden-center.jpeg
Tulsa Garden Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jewish Museum London
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tulsa Garden Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jewish Museum London in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tulsa Garden Center in 2025.

Incident History — Jewish Museum London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jewish Museum London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tulsa Garden Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tulsa Garden Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-museum-london.jpeg
Jewish Museum London
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-garden-center.jpeg
Tulsa Garden Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tulsa Garden Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jewish Museum London company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tulsa Garden Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jewish Museum London company.

In the current year, Tulsa Garden Center company and Jewish Museum London company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor Jewish Museum London company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor Jewish Museum London company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor Jewish Museum London company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jewish Museum London company nor Tulsa Garden Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jewish Museum London company nor Tulsa Garden Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jewish Museum London company employs more people globally than Tulsa Garden Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jewish Museum London nor Tulsa Garden Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-01
Updated
Date
2025-12-01
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-01
Updated
Date
2025-12-01
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Published
Date
2025-12-01
Updated
Date
2025-12-01
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Published
Date
2025-12-01
Updated
Date
2025-12-01
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-01
Updated
Date
2025-12-01
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References