Comparison Overview

Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte

VS

United Way of Greater Plymouth County

Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte

5007 Providence Road, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28226, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21

The mission of the Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte is to raise and distribute funds to support and to enrich the lives of Jews locally, nationally, in Israel and worldwide. Through education, planning, and community building the Federation's mission ensures that Jewish values, goals, traditions, and connections are preserved for current and future generations.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

United Way of Greater Plymouth County

934 West Chestnut Street, None, Brockton, MA, US, 02301
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

OUR MISSION... We unite people, ideas and resources to improve lives. OUR VISION... We envision a safe, healthy and well educated community where peoples'​ needs are met effectively, respectfully and compassionately. United Way of Greater Plymouth County focuses on the vital and interconnected needs of education, health and income. EDUCATION: Helping our children through early learning opportunities to be ready for school, helping our youth to be successful in school and safe through after school initiatives and mentoring in order to ensure their graduation from high school and success in higher education and gainful employment. HEALTH: Promoting the physical health and healthy living of our neighbors through access to health care services and preventative health education as well as treatment interventions to reduce child abuse, mental illness, substance addictions and domestic violence. INCOME: Providing for the basic needs of food, shelter and clothing for our families and our most vulnerable neighbors as well as affording pathways for them to sustainable employment and decent, affordable housing. Where do we serve? Abington, Avon, Bridgewater, Brockton, Carver, Duxbury, East Bridgewater, Easton, Halifax, Hanover, Hanson, Kingston, Lakeville, Marshfield, Middleboro, Pembroke, Plymouth, Plympton, Rockland, Stoughton, West Bridgewater, Whitman

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-federation-of-greater-charlotte.jpeg
Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-way-of-greater-plymouth-county.jpeg
United Way of Greater Plymouth County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
United Way of Greater Plymouth County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United Way of Greater Plymouth County in 2025.

Incident History — Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — United Way of Greater Plymouth County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United Way of Greater Plymouth County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jewish-federation-of-greater-charlotte.jpeg
Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-way-of-greater-plymouth-county.jpeg
United Way of Greater Plymouth County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company and United Way of Greater Plymouth County company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, United Way of Greater Plymouth County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company.

In the current year, United Way of Greater Plymouth County company and Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither United Way of Greater Plymouth County company nor Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither United Way of Greater Plymouth County company nor Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither United Way of Greater Plymouth County company nor Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte company employs more people globally than United Way of Greater Plymouth County company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jewish Federation of Greater Charlotte nor United Way of Greater Plymouth County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N