Comparison Overview

Jester Graphix

VS

63 Visual

Jester Graphix

08205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Offering competitive rates, speedy turnaround times and a ..knowledgeable approach to design. Over 15 years of graphic design experience will assure you a high quality piece at a cost-effective price. We Specialize In: • Graphic Design • Ads • Logos • Invitations • Cd Designs • Corporate Identity • Tee Shirts • Letterhead & Stationery • Outdoor Advertising • Posters And Signage • Web Page Design • Direct Mail • Brochures • Business Cards • Menus • Newsletters • Rack Cards • Spot Illustrations • Dvd Slide Shows • Photo retouching and manipulation • Photographic collages • Just About Anything Else You Can Think Of...

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

63 Visual

130 5th Ave N, Jacksonville Beach, FL, 32250, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

63 Visual is a graphic design studio in Jacksonville, FL specializing in brand development and web design with an emphasis on typography and illustration. With a background of advertising agency art direction and years of experience in the Jacksonville marketplace, an attention to detail and a fanatical passion for design are always maintained. 63 Visual remains active in the business community by continuing design education, organizing business related events and supporting progress in design thinking while striving to enhance the creative culture in North Florida through leadership with AIGA Jacksonville.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jester-graphix.jpeg
Jester Graphix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick-carter-design.jpeg
63 Visual
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jester Graphix
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
63 Visual
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jester Graphix in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 63 Visual in 2025.

Incident History — Jester Graphix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jester Graphix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 63 Visual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

63 Visual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jester-graphix.jpeg
Jester Graphix
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patrick-carter-design.jpeg
63 Visual
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jester Graphix company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 63 Visual company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 63 Visual company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jester Graphix company.

In the current year, 63 Visual company and Jester Graphix company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 63 Visual company nor Jester Graphix company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 63 Visual company nor Jester Graphix company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 63 Visual company nor Jester Graphix company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jester Graphix company nor 63 Visual company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jester Graphix company nor 63 Visual company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

63 Visual company employs more people globally than Jester Graphix company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jester Graphix nor 63 Visual holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X