Comparison Overview

Jester Communications

VS

Riverside Graphics and Web Design

Jester Communications

PO Box, Bluffton, 29910, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Jester Communications is a developer of Mobile Applications and Sales Support Systems designed to increase revenues and reduce expenses of corporations that have either large sales forces or dealer networks. Jester's award winning technology is now serving numerous national and international corporate clients and providing product in six different languages. Our office is located in historic downtown Bluffton, SC, the mainland gateway to beautiful Hilton Head Island. Our scenic and convenient location allows us to entice potential employees from Savannah, GA and Charleston, SC as well as major metropolitan cities like Columbia, SC and Atlanta, GA.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Riverside Graphics and Web Design

1437 Loganberry Dr, St Peters, MO, 63376, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

"Putting the Beauty of Nature into the Elements of Design" We are a graphic, web and print design company specializing in bringing life to your company image, advertising or product. Our passion is helping our customers grow by offering quality design services. We also provide website development in addition to design.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jester-communications.jpeg
Jester Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverside-graphics-and-web-design.jpeg
Riverside Graphics and Web Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jester Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Riverside Graphics and Web Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jester Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Riverside Graphics and Web Design in 2025.

Incident History — Jester Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jester Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Riverside Graphics and Web Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Riverside Graphics and Web Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jester-communications.jpeg
Jester Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/riverside-graphics-and-web-design.jpeg
Riverside Graphics and Web Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Jester Communications company and Riverside Graphics and Web Design company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Riverside Graphics and Web Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jester Communications company.

In the current year, Riverside Graphics and Web Design company and Jester Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Riverside Graphics and Web Design company nor Jester Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Riverside Graphics and Web Design company nor Jester Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Riverside Graphics and Web Design company nor Jester Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jester Communications company nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jester Communications company nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jester Communications company employs more people globally than Riverside Graphics and Web Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jester Communications nor Riverside Graphics and Web Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X