Comparison Overview

Jeremy Jensen Photography

VS

Gittings Portrait Photography

Jeremy Jensen Photography

undefined, Pleasant Grove, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Jeremy Jensen Photography Utah Based Natural Light, Portrait & Wedding Photographer Specializing in Portraits, Engagements, Families, Seniors, Weddings, Missionaries and custom stylized shoots. Owned and operated by Jeremy Jensen I try to fuse my love of technology with art and especially love editing photos. Cutting-edge photography technology and equipment helps me deliver a final product that both you and I can be proud of.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gittings Portrait Photography

3637 West Alabama St., Houston, TX, 77027, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Gittings is the photographer of choice for Texas business leaders and upscale consumers throughout the southwest. Since 1928, when Paul Gittings founded the company, we’ve been creating portraits whose beauty rivals paintings by the Old Masters. Presidents, princes, luminaries, top executives and influential families throughout Texas have trusted us to create exceptional portraits that will endure for generations. We invite you to browse the pages of our website to learn more about our history and some of the many celebrated personalities we’ve photographed, and to view the galleries of our exceptional work. We hope you’ll appreciate the quality and distinction of our fine portraiture and that you, too, will choose Gittings. We currently have studios in Houston, Dallas, and Fort Worth, with regular traveling schedules to New York, Washington D.C., Philadelphia, Atlanta, New Orleans.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeremy-jensen-photography.jpeg
Jeremy Jensen Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gittings-photography.jpeg
Gittings Portrait Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jeremy Jensen Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gittings Portrait Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jeremy Jensen Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gittings Portrait Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Jeremy Jensen Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jeremy Jensen Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gittings Portrait Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gittings Portrait Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeremy-jensen-photography.jpeg
Jeremy Jensen Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gittings-photography.jpeg
Gittings Portrait Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jeremy Jensen Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gittings Portrait Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gittings Portrait Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jeremy Jensen Photography company.

In the current year, Gittings Portrait Photography company and Jeremy Jensen Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gittings Portrait Photography company nor Jeremy Jensen Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gittings Portrait Photography company nor Jeremy Jensen Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gittings Portrait Photography company nor Jeremy Jensen Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography company nor Gittings Portrait Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography company nor Gittings Portrait Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gittings Portrait Photography company employs more people globally than Jeremy Jensen Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jeremy Jensen Photography nor Gittings Portrait Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N