Comparison Overview

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

VS

Downer

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners

Finisklin Business Park, Sligo, Connacht, IE, F91 RHH9
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Jennings O’Donovan is a multidisciplinary consulting engineering firm specialising in renewable energy, water supply, wastewater treatment and in the provision of planning and environmental services. Founded in 1950, the company, has offices across the country in Sligo and Dublin. Since 1st August 2023, the company is part of RSK Group. The extent of the services provided by the company covers a broad range of sectors including civil, structural and environmental engineering, health and safety, housing and commercial, aquaculture, flood relief, tourism, leisure amenity, water, wastewater and the renewable energy sector. The services we provide are based on over 70 years of experience working with local authorities, utilities, commercial entities and industries in Ireland and overseas. At Jennings O’Donovan, we pride ourselves on being responsive and in our ability to deliver clients expectations in an efficient and effective manner. The primary markets the company is currently operating in are Ireland, the United Kingdom and Eastern Europe.

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Downer

Triniti Business Campus, North Ryde, NSW, 2113, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Enabling communities to thrive. It’s what we’ve done for more than 150 years. Solving problems. Making the extraordinary run smoothly every day. We’re keeping the lights on and the water flowing. Running the hospitals that take care of us. Delivering the transport that takes us from A to B. Maintaining communication networks that keep people connected. Helping our Government and Defence customers keep them protected. Delivering train fleets. Building bridges, roads and streets. Now we’re building momentum too. Moving forward even faster. Across Australia and New Zealand, we’re transforming the way we work. Unlocking our potential to lead by example. Using our passion and expertise to deliver complex projects and turn fresh ideas into solutions that make society a better place. Creating opportunities for our people, growth and value for our shareholders, and world-class solutions for our customers. Imagining. Innovating. Engineering. Enabling.

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 17,888
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jennings-o'donovan-&-partners.jpeg
Jennings O'Donovan & Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/downer.jpeg
Downer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jennings O'Donovan & Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Downer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Downer in 2025.

Incident History — Jennings O'Donovan & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Downer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Downer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jennings-o'donovan-&-partners.jpeg
Jennings O'Donovan & Partners
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/downer.jpeg
Downer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Downer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Downer company has not reported any.

In the current year, Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company has reported more cyber incidents than Downer company.

Neither Downer company nor Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Downer company nor Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Downer company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company nor Downer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Downer company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company.

Downer company employs more people globally than Jennings O'Donovan & Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Civil Engineering.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jennings O'Donovan & Partners nor Downer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H