Comparison Overview

Jeffrey Samel & Partners

VS

elaw

Jeffrey Samel & Partners

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Frequently, high-profile companies and their defense attorneys are unable to "connect" with jurors in personal injury lawsuits. This unfortunate inability results in unjustified payouts and exposure to excessive jury awards, particularly in catastrophic injury cases. Over the course of nearly three decades, JEFFREY SAMEL & PARTNERS has successfully defended its clients against personal injury lawsuits. Our firm, founded in 1983, represents self-insured business entities, the insureds of liability carriers, and municipalities in trial and appellate litigation throughout New York and New Jersey, in the defense of negligence, motor vehicle, premises, construction, mass transit, product liability, municipal liability, toxic torts, insurance coverage, and professional liability matters. The firm is "AV" rated by Martindale-Hubbell. Our senior partner, Jeffrey Samel, is a frequent lecturer and is regarded by the legal community as one of the foremost authorities on trial advocacy. Many of the firm's other litigators lecture for various bar associations in the art of trial advocacy. The firm seeks to minimize litigation costs and to maximize the probability of successful outcomes in the defense of personal injury suits. Simply put, we strive to obtain the best possible result for our clients in each and every matter.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

elaw

201 Sussex St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

elaw is Australia's premiere eLitigation consultancy with expertise in the management, analysis, eDiscovery and presentation of evidence. We offer assistance through the entire eLitigation lifecycle, from early case assessment through to eHearings: - Forensic collection - Early case assessment - Data processing - Workflow & advisory - Analytics & technology assisted review - eDiscovery - Pre-trial preparation - eHearings We empower litigators, corporates and government agencies to actively engage in eLitigation using effective, defensible and best practice strategies. Our dedicated team of lawyers, technologists, project managers and analysts work seamlessly to deliver best-fit solutions and unmatched service to clients across Australia and beyond. With top-down commitment to innovation, quality, continuous learning and value, we deliver on our promise to provide a great workplace experience and exceptional client solutions. Based in Australia, we support clients and matters of all sizes in Asia Pacific, the UK, Europe and North America. Our strong partnership with a range of market-leading technology providers including Relativity, Nuix and Delium gives us the power and flexibility to recommend and support the best solution for your needs. Whatever the solution, you can expect tailored workflows and methodologies paired with expert advice and exceptional support.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jeffrey Samel & Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-law-international.jpeg
elaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jeffrey Samel & Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
elaw
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jeffrey Samel & Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for elaw in 2025.

Incident History — Jeffrey Samel & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jeffrey Samel & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — elaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

elaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Jeffrey Samel & Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-law-international.jpeg
elaw
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jeffrey Samel & Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to elaw company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, elaw company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jeffrey Samel & Partners company.

In the current year, elaw company and Jeffrey Samel & Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither elaw company nor Jeffrey Samel & Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither elaw company nor Jeffrey Samel & Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither elaw company nor Jeffrey Samel & Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners company nor elaw company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners company nor elaw company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

elaw company employs more people globally than Jeffrey Samel & Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jeffrey Samel & Partners nor elaw holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X