Comparison Overview

Jefferson Solenoid Valves

VS

AX Control Inc.

Jefferson Solenoid Valves

20225 NE 15TH CT, Miami, Florida, 33179, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Jefferson Solenoid Valves is a leading manufacturer with more than 50 years in the market developing a complete line of high quality solenoid valves and level controls. Jefferson’s products have international recognition in accordance with approvals of UL, CSA and ISO 9001, among others, which has permitted Jefferson Solenoid Valves to introduce its product range in most countries world wide. Jefferson's current catalog of standard products includes over 3,000 models between solenoid valves and magnetic level switches which satisfy different needs and industrial requirements to control the most diverse liquids and gases such as water, air, steam, oils, refrigerants, oxygen, liquid nitrogen, corrosive fluids and many others.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AX Control Inc.

1317 Transport Dr, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27603, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

AX Control Inc. carries Reliance Electric, General Electric (GE), Fuji Electric, Horner, Parker, and Eurotherm products, but we are always also happy to check our inventory to see if we have other product lines in stock. We specialize in drives/drive boards, HMIs, and PLCs; however we carry other products in association, for example, anything from interface and communication modules to power supplies, rectifier stacks, processors, motor controllers, and many more. At AX Control we pride ourselves in our knowledgeable and friendly staff, competitive pricing, quality products, unbeatable repair turnarounds, and the best warranty in the industry. Whether you’re looking for new surplus on a product or looking for a reconditioned part, we’ve got your back. Our inventory is comprised of mostly obsolete products, however we do our best to supply new factory stock, as well as new surplus products, which we’ve purchased directly from liquidated facilities, as well as reconditioned products, which have been through our extensive reconditioning and refurbishment process completed by our in-house experts to assure quality operation. At AX Control, we go the extra mile to guarantee satisfaction for our customers. We want your machinery or facility up and running at its highest level of performance. We are here to help.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-solenoid-valves.jpeg
Jefferson Solenoid Valves
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ax-control-inc-.jpeg
AX Control Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jefferson Solenoid Valves
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AX Control Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson Solenoid Valves in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AX Control Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Jefferson Solenoid Valves (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson Solenoid Valves cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AX Control Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AX Control Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-solenoid-valves.jpeg
Jefferson Solenoid Valves
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ax-control-inc-.jpeg
AX Control Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AX Control Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jefferson Solenoid Valves company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AX Control Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jefferson Solenoid Valves company.

In the current year, AX Control Inc. company and Jefferson Solenoid Valves company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AX Control Inc. company nor Jefferson Solenoid Valves company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AX Control Inc. company nor Jefferson Solenoid Valves company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AX Control Inc. company nor Jefferson Solenoid Valves company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves company nor AX Control Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves company nor AX Control Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AX Control Inc. company employs more people globally than Jefferson Solenoid Valves company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jefferson Solenoid Valves nor AX Control Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H