Comparison Overview

Jeff Field & Associates

VS

GCG (Garden City Group)

Jeff Field & Associates

342 North Clarendon Avenue, Scottdale, GA 30079, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Jeff Field & Associates, our lawyers are dedicated to helping people stop the harassment and find relief from debt. Bankruptcy is our firm's only practice and our lawyers have more than 70 years of combined experience guiding clients through the bankruptcy process. Our firm focuses on the two most common forms of bankruptcy — Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Chapter 7 bankruptcy provides people with a fresh start by discharging their unsecured debts. Chapter 13 bankruptcy offers individuals and businesses the opportunity to organize their debts into a payment schedule, which can help them repay creditors in a much more affordable manner. From offices conveniently located in Scottdale, Athens, Douglasville, Lawrenceville, Marietta and Gainesville, Jeff Field & Associates is able to serve clients throughout the Atlanta metropolitan area, including Decatur, Buford, Loganville and Dallas.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GCG (Garden City Group)

1985 Marcus Avenue, Lake Success, New York, 11042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For more than three decades, GCG has executed the most critical legal administrative tasks efficiently and effectively, so our clients can get back to work. We are the premier provider for class action settlement administrations, restructuring and bankruptcy matters, mass tort settlement programs, regulatory settlements, and data breach response programs in the United States and internationally. GCG’s team comprises attorneys*, paralegals, finance and banking experts, software engineers, in-house legal notice specialists, graphic artists with extensive website design experience, and U.S.-based Contact Center professionals hired, trained and managed by GCG. Our elite physical and human resources, superior quality assurance, and commitment to fraud prevention, compliance, and privacy protection underpin every matter we handle and contributed materially to GCG’s distinction as the first claims administrator to earn AICPA SOC 2, Type 1 Certification in 2013, a designation we repeated again in 2014 and 2015. GCG’s staff of approximately 700 employees includes attorneys*, paralegals, finance and banking experts, software engineers, in-house legal advertising specialists, graphic artists with extensive website design experience, and U.S.-based Contact Center professionals hired, trained and managed by GCG. Our presence is nationwide. We have full operations facilities in New York and Seattle and a 60,000 square foot state-of-the-art Mail, Processing and Contact Center in Dublin, Ohio. Regional offices in New Orleans, Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, and Orlando, and the operational resources of Settlement Services, Inc. (SSI), our Tallahassee, Florida-based subsidiary specializing in labor and employment class action administrations, put us feet-on-the-ground in cities around the United States and available to clients on short notice. *GCG does not engage in the practice of law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 456
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeff-field-and-associates.jpeg
Jeff Field & Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardencitygroup.jpeg
GCG (Garden City Group)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jeff Field & Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GCG (Garden City Group)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jeff Field & Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GCG (Garden City Group) in 2025.

Incident History — Jeff Field & Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jeff Field & Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GCG (Garden City Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GCG (Garden City Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeff-field-and-associates.jpeg
Jeff Field & Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardencitygroup.jpeg
GCG (Garden City Group)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jeff Field & Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GCG (Garden City Group) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GCG (Garden City Group) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jeff Field & Associates company.

In the current year, GCG (Garden City Group) company and Jeff Field & Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GCG (Garden City Group) company nor Jeff Field & Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GCG (Garden City Group) company nor Jeff Field & Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GCG (Garden City Group) company nor Jeff Field & Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates company nor GCG (Garden City Group) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GCG (Garden City Group) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jeff Field & Associates company.

GCG (Garden City Group) company employs more people globally than Jeff Field & Associates company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jeff Field & Associates nor GCG (Garden City Group) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X