Comparison Overview

Jeannie OConnor Studio

VS

Ashley Klinger & Co.

Jeannie OConnor Studio

2515 Magnolia St, Oakland, California, 94607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

We provide architectural photography for architects, contractors and home owners. Our photographs have been published in American Bungalow, Sn Francisco Chronicle Magazine, and Residential Design and Build. We work closely with our clients to ascertain their needs, and provide edited files, a website, and hardcover books of their images .

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ashley Klinger & Co.

undefined, New York, NY, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Here at Ashley Klinger & Co., we have been uniting creative artists with discerning clients since 1986. Representing a prestigious and diverse group of photographers and stylists, Ashley Klinger & Co. has its roots in JMI., the respected agency that Ashley acquired from Judith Miller in 2009. We cater to a broad spectrum of commercial clients, ranging from advertising and editorial to catalogs, cookbooks, non-profit, web, and social media platforms. Our photographers have mounted exhibitions in prestigious galleries and have published extensive compilations of their work. We care deeply about our clients and artists, forming long-term relationships based on mutual respect. We approach every project with good humor and the goal of making the process easy and the imagery exceptional. We are committed to excellence and complete attention to detail. As informed and engaged members of the global photo community, we are energetic and strategic partners, working with our artists and clients to successfully extend their reach in the expanding and shifting photo landscape. Representing: Sidney Bensimon Jessica Todd Harper James Merrell Marcus Nilsson Sue Parkhill Lucy Schaeffer David Sykes Eric Thompson Mikkel Vang Stylists: Food: Pearl Jones Prop and Interior: Hans Blomquist Martin Bourne Carla Gonzalez-Hart Art & Creative Direction: Katrine Hansen

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeannie-oconnor-studio.jpeg
Jeannie OConnor Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jmi-reps.jpeg
Ashley Klinger & Co.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jeannie OConnor Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ashley Klinger & Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jeannie OConnor Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ashley Klinger & Co. in 2025.

Incident History — Jeannie OConnor Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jeannie OConnor Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ashley Klinger & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ashley Klinger & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jeannie-oconnor-studio.jpeg
Jeannie OConnor Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jmi-reps.jpeg
Ashley Klinger & Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jeannie OConnor Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ashley Klinger & Co. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ashley Klinger & Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jeannie OConnor Studio company.

In the current year, Ashley Klinger & Co. company and Jeannie OConnor Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ashley Klinger & Co. company nor Jeannie OConnor Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ashley Klinger & Co. company nor Jeannie OConnor Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ashley Klinger & Co. company nor Jeannie OConnor Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio company nor Ashley Klinger & Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio company nor Ashley Klinger & Co. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ashley Klinger & Co. company employs more people globally than Jeannie OConnor Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jeannie OConnor Studio nor Ashley Klinger & Co. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N