Comparison Overview

JD.COM

VS

Snowflake

JD.COM

JD Building, No. 18 Kechuang 11 Street, BDA, Beijing, CN, 101111
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://corporate.jd.com/

JD.com, also known as JINGDONG, is a leading e-commerce company transferring to be a technology and service enterprise with supply chain at its core. JD.com’s business has expanded across retail, technology, logistics, health, property development, industrials, and international business. Ranking 44 on the Fortune Global 500, JD.com is China’s largest retailer by revenue. JD.com serves over 600 million customers and has set the standard for e-commerce through its commitment to quality, authenticity, and competitive pricing. The company operates the largest fulfillment infrastructure of any e-commerce company in China, enabling 90% of retail orders to be delivered within the same or next day. JD.com also promotes productivity and innovation across a range of industries by offering its cutting-edge technology and infrastructure to partners, brands, and diverse sectors.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 37,547
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Snowflake

The Cloud, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.snowflake.com

**Snowflake is proud to be the Official Data Collaboration Provider for LA28 and Team USA.** Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed data, and execute diverse analytic workloads. Wherever data or users live, Snowflake delivers a single and seamless experience across multiple public clouds. Snowflake’s platform is the engine that powers and provides access to the AI Data Cloud, creating a solution for data warehousing, data lakes, data engineering, data science, data application development, and data sharing. Join Snowflake customers, partners, and data providers already taking their businesses to new frontiers in the AI Data Cloud.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,269
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd.com.jpeg
JD.COM
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JD.COM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Snowflake
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JD.COM in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Snowflake in 2025.

Incident History — JD.COM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JD.COM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd.com.jpeg
JD.COM
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party contractor's employee
Motivation: Theft of customer credentials
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Multi-Channel Phishing (Email, SMS, Instant Messaging, Social Media, Malvertising), Malicious Links (Obfuscated, Hosted on Legitimate SaaS/Cloud Services), Fake CAPTCHA/Cloudflare Turnstile Lures (ClickFix), OAuth App Authorization Tricks (Device Code Flow, Salesforce Exploit), Malicious Browser Extensions (Takeover or New Installations), Malicious File Downloads (HTA, SVG, Executables), Stolen Credentials (From Phishing/Infostealers), MFA Gaps (Ghost Logins, SSO Misconfigurations)
Motivation: Data Theft (Extortion, Dark Web Sales), Financial Gain (Ransomware, Fraud), Account Takeover (Business Email Compromise, SaaS Abuse), Espionage (Corporate/Competitive Intelligence)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

JD.COM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Snowflake company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Snowflake company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas JD.COM company has not reported any.

In the current year, Snowflake company and JD.COM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Snowflake company nor JD.COM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Snowflake company has disclosed at least one data breach, while JD.COM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Snowflake company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while JD.COM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JD.COM company nor Snowflake company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Snowflake company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JD.COM company.

JD.COM company employs more people globally than Snowflake company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JD.COM nor Snowflake holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References