Comparison Overview

JD Graphic

VS

Dubai Printing Press

JD Graphic

1101 Arthur Ave, Elk Grove Village, IL, 60007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.JDGraphic.com

JD Graphic is a Chicago based full service commercial printing company with 48 years of experience. At JD Graphic, we listen to you, from start to finish, and provide what you need. You will receive quality and service, rooted in a family operated business, which listens to your needs and particular style of doing business, resulting in products delivered to you, exactly as you desire and when you require it.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Dubai Printing Press

Karama, Dubai, AE, P.O.Box 6820
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dubaipp.com

Founded in 1963, Dubai Printing Press was the first company to be established in the Khalifa Juma Al Nabooda Group. Today DPP is one of the leading printing companies in the region with an envious reputation for service and quality. Despite the use of the latest technology, DPP has retained the personal touch for all clients at all business levels. Turning images into reality We want to deliver a reliable, high-quality and efficient printing and publishing service in order to build solid, long-term relationships with our customers. We also want to maintain a friendly, open, honest and healthy working environment based upon sound business ethics, hard work and out-of-the-box thinking. Our Customers - Publicis Graphics, TBWA/RAAD, TMI JWT, Media Prima, BTL, Liaison Marketing, J2 Holdings Ministry of Defense/Dubai Police General H.Q./Dubai Municipality/DOHMS Dubai Chamber of Commerce, Research House for Islamic Study, Govt. of Dubai Port & Customs. ABELA & Co, Emirates Flight Catering Ajman University, Dubai University College, American University in Dubai, Dubai Islamic College, Higher Colleges of Technology The Magazine, Knotika, Hospitality, Russian Emirates Johnson & Johnson (M.E) Inc, Porsche Middle East FZE, British Business Group, British Tourist Authority, Arenco Group, Dubai Natural Gas Co. Ltd. Sri Lankan Airlines, Belhasa Driving Institute ITP Publishing, Dubai Library Distributors, Al Sahel Contracting Co. LLC The Millennium Hotel, Europcar, U.S. Consulate General, National Bank Of Abu Dhabi, R.A.K. CERAMICS

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 103
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd-graphic.jpeg
JD Graphic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dubai-printing-press.jpeg
Dubai Printing Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JD Graphic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dubai Printing Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JD Graphic in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dubai Printing Press in 2025.

Incident History — JD Graphic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JD Graphic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dubai Printing Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dubai Printing Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd-graphic.jpeg
JD Graphic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dubai-printing-press.jpeg
Dubai Printing Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JD Graphic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dubai Printing Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dubai Printing Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JD Graphic company.

In the current year, Dubai Printing Press company and JD Graphic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dubai Printing Press company nor JD Graphic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dubai Printing Press company nor JD Graphic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dubai Printing Press company nor JD Graphic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JD Graphic company nor Dubai Printing Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JD Graphic company nor Dubai Printing Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dubai Printing Press company employs more people globally than JD Graphic company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JD Graphic nor Dubai Printing Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References