Comparison Overview

JD Cooling Group

VS

SpacePak

JD Cooling Group

Hansa Court, King’s Lynn, Norfolk, PE30 2HN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

JD Cooling Group is the leading independent supplier of temperature control systems. As specialists in cooling, industrial refrigeration, heating, electrical, automation controls, robotics, industrial doors, barriers, and specialist cleaning schedules, we provide the full in-house turnkey solution, delivering a hassle-free, wholly project managed, end-to-end service from design to full installation, testing and completed system.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SpacePak

260 North Elm Street, Westfield, 01085, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

In addition to being the innovators and pioneers of small duct high velocity systems, SpacePak is also the industry leader in air-to-water heat pump technology and considers itself to be the driving force behind the adoption of air-to-water heat pumps in North America since 2011. SpacePak’s parent company Mestek Inc., located in Westfield, MA, was established in 1946 and has over 75 years of hydronic heating and cooling expertise and beyond. The Mestek family of companies is comprised of more than 45 specialty manufacturers providing a wide range of innovative solutions that span the heating, cooling, controls, ventilating, metal forming machinery, and architectural industries.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd-cooling-systems-ltd.jpeg
JD Cooling Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacepak.jpeg
SpacePak
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JD Cooling Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SpacePak
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JD Cooling Group in 2025.

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpacePak in 2025.

Incident History — JD Cooling Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JD Cooling Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SpacePak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpacePak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd-cooling-systems-ltd.jpeg
JD Cooling Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacepak.jpeg
SpacePak
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SpacePak company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JD Cooling Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SpacePak company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JD Cooling Group company.

In the current year, SpacePak company and JD Cooling Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SpacePak company nor JD Cooling Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SpacePak company nor JD Cooling Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SpacePak company nor JD Cooling Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JD Cooling Group company nor SpacePak company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SpacePak company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to JD Cooling Group company.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JD Cooling Group nor SpacePak holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H