Comparison Overview

JD&Co. Creative

VS

PIO

JD&Co. Creative

420 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10170, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

JD&Co. Design is an award-winning boutique creative agency based in NYC. From branding to digital, we craft bespoke design solutions for companies of all shapes and sizes.  BRAND STRATEGY Tone, Values, Personality, Purpose, Product & Service Portfolio Architecture DESIGN STRATEGY Design Style & Assets, Messaging, Brand Guardianship, Brand Extension DIGITAL AND SOCIAL Responsive Website Design, E-Blasts, Social & Digital Advertising PRINT AND ENVIRONMENTAL Packaging, Event Branding, Point of Sale, Out of Home, Books, Magazines, Environmental Graphics ILLUSTRATION Hand-Drawn Illustrations, Vector Illustrations, 3D Illustrations, Lettering

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PIO

Yeonathan 9, Bnei Braq, 51209, IL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

A galaxy of visual solutions. Pio is a graphic solution service based in Israel. We specialize in creating assets for iPhone and FaceBook applications as well as offering a variety of creative content sourcing for web and print. PIO is a veritable powerhouse of imaginative contemporary design. Don't let our youth fool you, we rely on hard earned experience and bullet proof awesomeness to bring you the best in image crafting. Get started today on upgrading your visual products. Contact us.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd&co-design-studio.jpeg
JD&Co. Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pio.jpeg
PIO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JD&Co. Creative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PIO
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JD&Co. Creative in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PIO in 2025.

Incident History — JD&Co. Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JD&Co. Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PIO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PIO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd&co-design-studio.jpeg
JD&Co. Creative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pio.jpeg
PIO
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PIO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JD&Co. Creative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PIO company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JD&Co. Creative company.

In the current year, PIO company and JD&Co. Creative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PIO company nor JD&Co. Creative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PIO company nor JD&Co. Creative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PIO company nor JD&Co. Creative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JD&Co. Creative company nor PIO company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JD&Co. Creative company nor PIO company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PIO company employs more people globally than JD&Co. Creative company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor PIO holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X