Comparison Overview

JD&Co. Creative

VS

A Signs

JD&Co. Creative

420 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10170, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

JD&Co. Design is an award-winning boutique creative agency based in NYC. From branding to digital, we craft bespoke design solutions for companies of all shapes and sizes.  BRAND STRATEGY Tone, Values, Personality, Purpose, Product & Service Portfolio Architecture DESIGN STRATEGY Design Style & Assets, Messaging, Brand Guardianship, Brand Extension DIGITAL AND SOCIAL Responsive Website Design, E-Blasts, Social & Digital Advertising PRINT AND ENVIRONMENTAL Packaging, Event Branding, Point of Sale, Out of Home, Books, Magazines, Environmental Graphics ILLUSTRATION Hand-Drawn Illustrations, Vector Illustrations, 3D Illustrations, Lettering

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A Signs

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

A-Signs has been established since 2002, originally supplying fire and safety signage. We have brought forward our portfolio to include vehicle graphics, digital displays and banners, shop fascias and much more. We design, manufacture and install signs to your own specifications, schedules and budget, no matter what size your business. With investment in the latest equipment, A-Signs are able to deliver quality and quantity without compromise. Whether its a small house sign or a neon sign, be sure to call in and see us at our showroom for a no obligation quote.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd&co-design-studio.jpeg
JD&Co. Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-signs.jpeg
A Signs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JD&Co. Creative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A Signs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JD&Co. Creative in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Signs in 2025.

Incident History — JD&Co. Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JD&Co. Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A Signs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Signs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jd&co-design-studio.jpeg
JD&Co. Creative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-signs.jpeg
A Signs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A Signs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JD&Co. Creative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A Signs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JD&Co. Creative company.

In the current year, A Signs company and JD&Co. Creative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A Signs company nor JD&Co. Creative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A Signs company nor JD&Co. Creative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A Signs company nor JD&Co. Creative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JD&Co. Creative company nor A Signs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JD&Co. Creative company nor A Signs company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JD&Co. Creative company employs more people globally than A Signs company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JD&Co. Creative nor A Signs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X