Comparison Overview

JC Printing and Advertising, Inc.

VS

FM Expressions

JC Printing and Advertising, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jcprintinginc.com

Our mission is to provide you with the highest-quality products and services possible in a timely fashion and at a competitive price. We promise to listen to you and help you achieve your business goals. We will always be there with honest, expert advice and quick, friendly customer service. Our goal is to meet and exceed your expectations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

FM Expressions

401 Taylor Ave, Gordonsville, VA, 22942, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fmexpressions.com/

Founded in 1981, FM Expressions has grown to employ over 450 employees delivering creative and manufacturing artistry to the apparel decoration industry. We offer a full range of solutions, including screen-printing, heat transfer manufacturing and application, warehousing, fulfillment, logistics, a full-service art department, and custom software application development and deployment. Combined with one of the most experienced management teams in the industry, FM provides strategic print solutions to its varied customers around the globe. We work around the clock to offer full-service solutions to: Bravado International (who holds licensing to print apparel for bands such as Rolling Stones, The Beatles, Bob Marley and Lady Gaga), Fanatics (fan ware for NBA, NFL, NHL, etc.,) and Hard Rock Café, to name a few. Our operation facilities consist of two production and warehousing facilities: one in Secaucus, New Jersey, responsible for over 60,000 garments decorated each week and one in Gordonsville, Virginia, producing 200,000+ heat transfers every day.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jc-printing-and-advertising-inc..jpeg
JC Printing and Advertising, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/f&m-expressions.jpeg
FM Expressions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JC Printing and Advertising, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FM Expressions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FM Expressions in 2025.

Incident History — JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FM Expressions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FM Expressions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jc-printing-and-advertising-inc..jpeg
JC Printing and Advertising, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/f&m-expressions.jpeg
FM Expressions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FM Expressions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, FM Expressions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company.

In the current year, FM Expressions company and JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FM Expressions company nor JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FM Expressions company nor JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FM Expressions company nor JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company nor FM Expressions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company nor FM Expressions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FM Expressions company employs more people globally than JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JC Printing and Advertising, Inc. nor FM Expressions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References