Comparison Overview

JBF National

VS

L&S Engineering

JBF National

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

JBF National is a leading industrial products manufacturer and distributor based out of Farmington Hills Michigan. We are committed to providing solutions to industrial product needs through superior customer service with the help of our highly trained sales technicians and support staff. Our products are manufactured to the highest standard of quality, and are used in a vast array of applications across a spectrum of industries and organizations including retail, automotive, printing, military, aerospace, medical, the United States government, biotech, transportation, distribution, and more. Our industrial products catalogue includes, adjustable handles, magnets, quick release pins, anti-vibration mounts, hand knobs, crank handles, leveling pads, handwheels, toggle clamps, revolving handles, pull handles, ball and spring plungers, retractable plungers, and more. We also specialize in design customization capabilities including die and sand castings, machining, forming, welding, and laser cutting.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

L&S Engineering

216 W Pacific Ave, Spokane, Washington, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

L&S Engineering is a consulting firm specializing in Mechanical and Electrical engineering, primarily working in the commercial and institutional construction industry, as consultants to architects or building owners. We work for a variety of clients in the public and private sector on as many as two hundred projects a year. We provide expertise in code compliance, building commissioning, energy modeling, LEED certification submittal, construction administration and mechanical / electrical engineering. L&S Engineering has been providing high performance designs for commercial buildings in the Inland Northwest for over 65 years.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jbf-national.jpeg
JBF National
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lseng.jpeg
L&S Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JBF National
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L&S Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JBF National in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&S Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — JBF National (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JBF National cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L&S Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&S Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jbf-national.jpeg
JBF National
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lseng.jpeg
L&S Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

L&S Engineering company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JBF National company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, L&S Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JBF National company.

In the current year, L&S Engineering company and JBF National company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L&S Engineering company nor JBF National company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L&S Engineering company nor JBF National company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L&S Engineering company nor JBF National company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JBF National company nor L&S Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JBF National company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to L&S Engineering company.

L&S Engineering company employs more people globally than JBF National company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JBF National nor L&S Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H