Comparison Overview

Jazz

VS

KPN

Jazz

Jazz Digital Headquarter, 1- A, Kohistan Road, F-8 Markaz, Islamabad, Federal Capital Area, 44000, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Pakistan’s number one digital operator and the largest internet and broadband service provider with over 70 million subscribers nationwide. With a legacy of more than 27 years, Jazz maintains market leadership through cutting-edge, integrated technology, the strongest brands and the largest portfolio of value added services in the industry. Housing a nation-wide network of contact centers and an unparalleled fibre optic backbone of more than 25,000 kilometers, Jazz has already invested billions of dollars in the country to date. It also provides uninterrupted countrywide connectivity, unmatched customer services and international roaming in over 150 countries. As a responsible entity, the company passionately supports education, health and environmental initiatives and promotes sustainable business practices. Jazz offers exclusive & personalized tariff plans that empower customers and cater to the communication needs of a diverse group of people, from individuals to businessmen to corporate and multinationals. Through its innovative services and products, Jazz is set to bring about a digital revolution that will enable and transform societies towards a more progressive Pakistan.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 12,859
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

KPN

Wilhelminakade 123, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, 3072 AP, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Welkom bij de LinkedIn pagina van KPN. Sinds jaar en dag maakt KPN technologie toegankelijk. Hier leest u alles over de ontwikkelingen rondom de thema’s die KPN belangrijk vindt, zoals Het Nieuwe Leven & Werken, Veiligheid & Privacy en ICT-infrastructuur. Ook een transparante en betrouwbare dienstverlener zijn, efficiency in de zorg en duurzaam ondernemen staan bij ons hoog in het vaandel. Op onze pagina blijft u op de hoogte van het laatste nieuws rondom onze activiteiten, de thema’s in uw leven waarin technologie een rol speelt en onze producten en services op het gebied van ICT. Ontdek samen met ons voor u en uw organisatie de beste oplossingen en voel je vrij.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 17,597
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jazzpk.jpeg
Jazz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpn.jpeg
KPN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jazz
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KPN
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jazz in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPN in 2025.

Incident History — Jazz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jazz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jazzpk.jpeg
Jazz
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpn.jpeg
KPN
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KPN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jazz company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Jazz company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KPN company has not reported any.

In the current year, KPN company and Jazz company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KPN company nor Jazz company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KPN company nor Jazz company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Jazz company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while KPN company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Jazz company nor KPN company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Jazz company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KPN company.

KPN company employs more people globally than Jazz company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jazz nor KPN holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H