Comparison Overview

The CJK Group

VS

Griesing Law

The CJK Group

445 South Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA, 90067, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The CJK Group, an Elevate Law company, is a legal process outsourcing business that specializes in the review and categorization of multi-language data and English-language data. Our cross-disciplinary, multi-language teams are deployed during the discovery phase of litigation, investigations & transaction-based due diligence. We provide managed services and deploy multi-language professionals in Asia and North America. We design review workflows uniquely tailored to empower law firm associates to quickly, accurately and cost-effectively identify the most relevant documents. For additional information, please visit The CJK Group at www.TheCJKGroup.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Griesing Law

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, 19103
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Griesing Law is committed to personal attention with proven results. We aggressively advocate complex matters with integrity, purpose and efficiency. Together, we care about our people, our clients and our communities. Our firm is based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We are a 100% women-owned, and we are proudly certified as a Women Business Enterprise by WBENC. We represent Fortune 500 companies, government entities, closely-held companies, non-profits, and individuals in alternative dispute resolution, employment & investigations, and provide litigation consulting. We are licensed to practice in AZ, NY and PA.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/japanese-doc-review-llc.jpeg
The CJK Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griesinglaw.jpeg
Griesing Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The CJK Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Griesing Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The CJK Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Griesing Law in 2025.

Incident History — The CJK Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The CJK Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Griesing Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Griesing Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/japanese-doc-review-llc.jpeg
The CJK Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/griesinglaw.jpeg
Griesing Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The CJK Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Griesing Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Griesing Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The CJK Group company.

In the current year, Griesing Law company and The CJK Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Griesing Law company nor The CJK Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Griesing Law company nor The CJK Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Griesing Law company nor The CJK Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The CJK Group company nor Griesing Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The CJK Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Griesing Law company.

The CJK Group company employs more people globally than Griesing Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The CJK Group nor Griesing Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X