Comparison Overview

Japanese Culture Center

VS

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City

Japanese Culture Center

1016 West Belmont Avenue, Chicago, 60657, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Japanese Culture Center was established in 1977 in Chicago by Aikido Shihan (Teacher of Teachers) and Zen Master Fumio Toyoda to make some of the martial arts, crafts, and philosophical riches of Japan available to the public. Today the JCC continues this tradition, offering classes in over a dozen martial and cultural arts. The Center is not a museum where lifeless objects are displayed; it is a school where living skills are passed on person to person from generation to generation. You become an active participant in arts that have been around for hundreds, if not thousands of years. We invite you to visit and experience the richness and complexity of knowledge cultivated around the world. Upon entering the Center you will see a wooden panel on which are carved the characters “Ten Shin Kan,” or “Place of the Universal Mind/Body/Spirit”. In the spirit of the traditional training halls, the JCC is a true “dojo”, or “house of the way”.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City

433 E Red Bridge Rd, Kansas City, MO, US, 64131
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City's mission is to spark a lifelong love of learning through the universal and uniting power of play. Wonderscope is the KC region’s only fully accessible, non-profit children’s museum dedicated to providing STEAM – Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Math – educational experiences for young children and their families. Wonderscope features 30,000 square feet of indoor exploration and 1/2 acre of year-round outdoor adventure, all with a unique Kansas City theme. The museum is easily accessible via public transportation and major roadways.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/japanese-culture-center.jpeg
Japanese Culture Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wonderscope-children's-museum-of-kansas-city.jpeg
The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Japanese Culture Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Japanese Culture Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City in 2026.

Incident History — Japanese Culture Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Japanese Culture Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/japanese-culture-center.jpeg
Japanese Culture Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wonderscope-children's-museum-of-kansas-city.jpeg
The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Japanese Culture Center company and The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Japanese Culture Center company.

In the current year, The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company and Japanese Culture Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company nor Japanese Culture Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company nor Japanese Culture Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company nor Japanese Culture Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Japanese Culture Center company nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Japanese Culture Center company nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City company employs more people globally than Japanese Culture Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Japanese Culture Center nor The Regnier Family Wonderscope Children's Museum of Kansas City holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N