Comparison Overview

Japan Science and Technology Agency

VS

American Benefits Council

Japan Science and Technology Agency

JP
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.jst.go.jp/EN/index.html

The Japan Information Center of Science and Technology (JICST) was founded in 1957. The Research Development Corporation of Japan (JRDC) was founded in 1961. JICST disseminated science and technology information and JRDC promoted basic research, new technology development and research exchange. JICST and JRDC were merged into the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST) in 1996. On October 1, 2003, it was reorganized into the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) by the transformation into independent administrative institutions.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

American Benefits Council

1501 M Street NW, Washington, DC, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.americanbenefitscouncil.org/

The American Benefits Council (the Council) is recognized as the preeminent advocate of employer-sponsored benefit programs in Washington, D.C. Our mission is to be the most effective advocate for voluntary private employee benefits. Our members either sponsor directly, administer or service retirement, health and stock compensation plans covering more than 100 million Americans. We are major corporations sponsoring comprehensive and diverse benefit plans. We are professionals in the benefits field with expertise in investments, retirement, health insurance, accounting, actuarial science, banking, law, and benefits consulting who provide service and support to corporate benefit plan sponsors. The Council initiates and champions legislation and regulations favorable to our members'​ needs and interests, and influences policy development within Congress and the White House and executive branch agencies. We fend off policy proposals that add burdens, liabilities and costs for the employer plan sponsor community. We serve as a technical resource on benefits issues for lawmakers, the media and other industry trade associations. We also lead other public policy organizations in developing and communicating a collective business community position and forge alliances on benefits issues. We are an active participant as a "friend of the court"​ in judicial cases affecting benefits.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Japan Science and Technology Agency
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benefitscouncil.jpeg
American Benefits Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Japan Science and Technology Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Benefits Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Japan Science and Technology Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Benefits Council in 2025.

Incident History — Japan Science and Technology Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Japan Science and Technology Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Benefits Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Benefits Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benefitscouncil.jpeg
American Benefits Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Japan Science and Technology Agency company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Benefits Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Benefits Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Japan Science and Technology Agency company.

In the current year, American Benefits Council company and Japan Science and Technology Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Benefits Council company nor Japan Science and Technology Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Benefits Council company nor Japan Science and Technology Agency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Benefits Council company nor Japan Science and Technology Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency company nor American Benefits Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency company nor American Benefits Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Japan Science and Technology Agency company employs more people globally than American Benefits Council company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Japan Science and Technology Agency nor American Benefits Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References