Comparison Overview

Japan House London

VS

Institute of Contemporary Art San José

Japan House London

101 Kensington High Street, London, England, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.japanhouselondon.uk/

Japan House is the London home for Japanese creativity and innovation. Spread over three floors, Japan House London offers a gallery, with a regular programme of exhibitions; a hall for talks, performances, workshops and events; innovative Japanese restaurant AKIRA; and The Shop, a cultural retail space introducing Japanese products: their provenance and the artisans and designers who make them.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Institute of Contemporary Art San José

560 S 1st St, San Jose, 95113, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://sjica.org

In a region noted for its spirit of innovation and global influence, contemporary art is valued for enriching and revealing our shared humanity. The ICA San José champions artists and cultivates engagement with contemporary art through thought-provoking exhibitions and programs. The ICA has long been committed to presenting exhibitions that include visually compelling and conceptually challenging contemporary art, as well as a variety of educational programs intended to help our audiences reflect upon these works. Exhibitions are presented in three galleries and the space is activated by opening receptions, First Friday gallery walks, panel discussions via our Talking Art lecture series, and impromptu conversations in the galleries. Founded in 1980, the ICA is a member-supported, non-profit organization. Admission is free.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/japan-house-london.jpeg
Japan House London
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-jose-institute-of-contemporary-art.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art San José
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Japan House London
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute of Contemporary Art San José
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Japan House London in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Contemporary Art San José in 2026.

Incident History — Japan House London (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Japan House London cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute of Contemporary Art San José (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Contemporary Art San José cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/japan-house-london.jpeg
Japan House London
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-jose-institute-of-contemporary-art.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art San José
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Japan House London company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Institute of Contemporary Art San José company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Institute of Contemporary Art San José company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Japan House London company.

In the current year, Institute of Contemporary Art San José company and Japan House London company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art San José company nor Japan House London company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art San José company nor Japan House London company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art San José company nor Japan House London company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Japan House London company nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Japan House London company nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Japan House London company employs more people globally than Institute of Contemporary Art San José company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Japan House London nor Institute of Contemporary Art San José holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References