Comparison Overview

JAM+

VS

Union Mart Ltd

JAM+

None
Last Update: 2025-12-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.jamplus.com

Through flagship websites and specialized ecommerce platforms, JAM+ websites focus on customized products and have a shared e-commerce platform that powers a multi-brand shopping experience, a core marketing engine and shared back office operations. JAM brand items are sold through its own DTC channels such as Envelopes.com, JAMPaper.com, Folders.com, and labelsnstickers.com. JAM branded items are also sold through the largest ecommerce websites including Amazon, Staples, Office Depot, & WB Mason. Backed by private equity firm TZP Group and led by CEO Andrew Jacobs, JAM+ brands continue to innovate and expand into new categories.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Union Mart Ltd

Unit 4, Nursling Industrial Estate, Mauretania Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 0YS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-30
Between 750 and 799
http://unionmartltd.co.uk

Specialising in the fast-paced, ever popular world of washers and winches, we supply a demanding clientele with the very best in commercial and domestic appliance solutions. We are a small, dedicated team with specialist knowledge, on hand to provide expert advice and pass on the years of experience we have to directly benefit our customers. Wilks USA Pressure Washers, both petrol and electric - they are extremely powerful and are currently cleaning the driveways and patios of thousands of homes across the world. Rhino Winches - Currently the fastest selling winches on the market they range from compact 3000lb ATV series to the 20,000lb monster, capable of pulling large vehicles out of deep mud. Our business is for you - to offer the best service possible providing top-quality products which we are proud to call our own.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jampluss.jpeg
JAM+
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/union-mart-ltd.jpeg
Union Mart Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JAM+
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Union Mart Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JAM+ in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Union Mart Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — JAM+ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JAM+ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Union Mart Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Union Mart Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jampluss.jpeg
JAM+
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/union-mart-ltd.jpeg
Union Mart Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JAM+ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Union Mart Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Union Mart Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to JAM+ company.

In the current year, Union Mart Ltd company and JAM+ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Union Mart Ltd company nor JAM+ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Union Mart Ltd company nor JAM+ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Union Mart Ltd company nor JAM+ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither JAM+ company nor Union Mart Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither JAM+ company nor Union Mart Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JAM+ company employs more people globally than Union Mart Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JAM+ nor Union Mart Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References