Comparison Overview

James Wood Motors

VS

JLR

James Wood Motors

2111 U.S. Highway 287 South, Decatur, TX, 76206, US
Last Update: 2025-05-04 (UTC)

Strong

James Wood Decatur is Open & Ready to Help Our Sales, Service, Parts and Body Shops are all accessible online. We are here to serve you at the dealership, or ask about our No-Contact Pick Up & Delivery Options. James Wood Motors in Decatur, Texas is a short drive from the DFW Metroplex. We have a HUGE selection of Chevrolet, GMC and Buick New Vehicles. As well as, hundreds of PreOwned Cars, Trucks and SUVs. James Wood has been serving North Texas since 1978. The Decatur store has been awarded Chevrolet Dealer of the Year twice. Our Decatur location offers customers a GM Certified Service and Parts Center, as well as, a full service Collision Center and Body Shop. We are heavily involved in our community and invite you to visit Decatur!

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JLR

Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, West Midlands, GB, CV3 4LF
Last Update: 2025-09-03 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Every vehicle. Every innovation. Every bit of momentum in over 170 markets worldwide. None of it would be possible without the expertise, drive and continued ambition of our people. Weโ€™re proud of our heritage, but itโ€™s our vision for the future that excites us most. Right across our business, everybody plays a crucial role in the ever-evolving JLR journey. And with exciting new products, cutting-edge facilities and continued growth into new markets, there has never been a more exciting time to join us. We may be renowned for our iconic vehicles, but our drive for excellence covers more than premium design and world-class engineering. Ours is a truly global business, with the opportunities to match. You can learn more about our business areas and current opportunities here on the JLR Linked Company pages. This is also the place to ask any questions you may have, share your experiences and talk to the other talented individuals who are thinking about joining us. We look forward to talking with you.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 42,905
Subsidiaries: 61
12-month incidents
10
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-wood-motors.jpeg
James Wood Motors
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-land-rover_1.jpeg
JLR
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
James Wood Motors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JLR
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for James Wood Motors in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

JLR has 1823.08% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” James Wood Motors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

James Wood Motors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” JLR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-wood-motors.jpeg
James Wood Motors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-land-rover_1.jpeg
JLR
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both James Wood Motors company and JLR company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

JLR company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas James Wood Motors company has not reported any.

In the current year, JLR company has reported more cyber incidents than James Wood Motors company.

JLR company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while James Wood Motors company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JLR company has disclosed at least one data breach, while James Wood Motors company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JLR company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while James Wood Motors company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither James Wood Motors company nor JLR company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

JLR company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to James Wood Motors company.

JLR company employs more people globally than James Wood Motors company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreshRSS is a free, self-hostable RSS aggregator. Versions 1.26.3 and below do not sanitize certain event handler attributes in feed content, so by finding a page that renders feed entries without CSP, it is possible to execute an XSS payload. The Allow API access authentication setting needs to be enabled by the instance administrator beforehand for the attack to work as it relies on api/query.php. An account takeover is possible by sending a change password request via the XSS payload / setting UserJS for persistence / stealing the autofill password / displaying a phishing page with a spoofed URL using history.replaceState() If the victim is an administrator, the attacker can also perform administrative actions. This issue is fixed in version 1.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.6 and below, go-f3 panics when it validates a "poison" messages causing Filecoin nodes consuming F3 messages to become vulnerable. A "poison" message can can cause integer overflow in the signer index validation, which can cause the whole node to crash. These malicious messages aren't self-propagating since the bug is in the validator. An attacker needs to directly send the message to all targets. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.7.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

go-f3 is a Golang implementation of Fast Finality for Filecoin (F3). In versions 0.8.8 and below, go-f3's justification verification caching mechanism has a vulnerability where verification results are cached without properly considering the context of the message. An attacker can bypass justification verification by submitting a valid message with a correct justification and then reusing the same cached justification in contexts where it would normally be invalid. This occurs because the cached verification does not properly validate the relationship between the justification and the specific message context it's being used with. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.9.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Description

mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin is an Mkdocs Markdown includer plugin. In versions 7.1.7 and below, there is a vulnerability where unvalidated input can collide with substitution placeholders. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Description

go-mail is a comprehensive library for sending mails with Go. In versions 0.7.0 and below, due to incorrect handling of the mail.Address values when a sender- or recipient address is passed to the corresponding MAIL FROM or RCPT TO commands of the SMTP client, there is a possibility of wrong address routing or even ESMTP parameter smuggling. For successful exploitation, it is required that the user's code allows for arbitrary mail address input (i. e. through a web form or similar). If only static mail addresses are used (i. e. in a config file) and the mail addresses in use do not consist of quoted local parts, this should not affect users. This issue is fixed in version 0.7.1

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X