Comparison Overview

James Pembroke Media

VS

Gyldendal Norsk Forlag

James Pembroke Media

90 Walcot Street, Bath, BA1 5BG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

James Pembroke Media consistently produces hard-working communications solutions tailored to meet the objectives of our clients. With over 30 years experience in the world of newsstand magazine publishing, we know how to give brand communications readability and credibility. Our client solutions now include a greater emphasis on digital content, websites and social media marketing and the business has expanded to offer events and conferences for industry leaders. As well as The Oldie, our portfolio includes a large number of national membership organisations and blue chip clients across a wide variety of sectors.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gyldendal Norsk Forlag

Sehesteds gate 4, Oslo, NO, 0164
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Gjennom snart hundre år har Gyldendal hatt en viktig rolle i det norske samfunnet. Vi har skapt og formidlet kunnskap, litteratur, underholdning og samfunnsforståelse. Underveis har verden vært i kontinuerlig endring, og vi har endret oss med den. Vår historie er preget av en stadig søken etter nye og bedre måter å utøve vårt oppdrag på. Fra blysats til kunstig intelligens. Og slik skal vi fortsette å utvikle oss. Når verden nå endres på alle tenkelige områder, skal vi utnytte energien og mulighetene endringene gir til å styrke vårt arbeid for et vitalt norsk språk, for bedre læring og litteratur, for handel og formidling og for et opplysende offentlig ordskifte med ytringsfrihet og meningsmangfold. Vi skal hente kraft fra spennet mellom kremmerskap og kunst, mellom å forvalte tradisjoner og å skape en ny fremtid, og slik fortsette å gi nytte, glede og verdi til mennesker i alle faser av livet.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 390
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-pembroke-publishing.jpeg
James Pembroke Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gyldendal-norsk-forlag.jpeg
Gyldendal Norsk Forlag
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
James Pembroke Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gyldendal Norsk Forlag
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for James Pembroke Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gyldendal Norsk Forlag in 2025.

Incident History — James Pembroke Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

James Pembroke Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gyldendal Norsk Forlag (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gyldendal Norsk Forlag cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-pembroke-publishing.jpeg
James Pembroke Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gyldendal-norsk-forlag.jpeg
Gyldendal Norsk Forlag
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to James Pembroke Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to James Pembroke Media company.

In the current year, Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company and James Pembroke Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company nor James Pembroke Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company nor James Pembroke Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company nor James Pembroke Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither James Pembroke Media company nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither James Pembroke Media company nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gyldendal Norsk Forlag company employs more people globally than James Pembroke Media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds HIPAA certification.

Neither James Pembroke Media nor Gyldendal Norsk Forlag holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.