Comparison Overview

James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy

VS

Oregon Justice Resource Center

James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy

1900 a Dempster St, Evanston, Illinois, 60201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy (“Moran Center"​) provides Evanston youth and their families with integrated legal, mental health, and restorative justice services to improve their quality of life at home, at school, and within the community for more than 42 years. Our goal is to provide Evanston youth and their families with the support to successfully emerge from a challenging legal situation, the tools to refrain from self-destructive behavior, and the ability to thrive in the local community. To that end, our programmatic approach focuses on direct advocacy, representation, and client and community restoration.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Oregon Justice Resource Center

PO Box 5248, Portland, Oregon, 97208, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Oregon Justice Resource Center was founded in 2011 by Bobbin Singh and Erin McKee. We work to promote civil rights and improve legal representation for communities that have often been underserved in the past: people living in poverty and people of color among them. We work in collaboration with other, like-minded, organizations to maximize our reach to serve underrepresented populations, to train future public interest lawyers, and to educate our community on civil rights and current civil liberties concerns. Our work includes: Oregon Innocence Project: to assist people who have been wrongly convicted and imprisoned in clearing their names. Women's Justice Project: to address the needs of women in the criminal justice system through direct services to incarcerated women as well as litigation, legislative reform, and other policy and communications initiatives. Immigrant Rights Project: to provide personalized advice to public defense providers regarding the immigration consequences of pleas and convictions for their non-citizen clients. IRP attorneys work with defense counsel to assess the risks of detention, deportation, and inadmissibility, as well as the likelihood and best options for discretionary relief from deportation based on the non-citizen’s criminal, immigration, family, and personal history. Civil Rights Project: to examine, track, and litigate civil rights issues related to the criminal justice system. The CRP seeks to secure equal and fair treatment for individuals intersecting with the criminal legal system, and accountability and systemic reform through strategic litigation, public education, programming, and policy advocacy. The Youth Justice Project: to address systemic flaws in Oregon’s treatment of youth in the adult system by identifying and assisting young people sentenced under Measure 11 (Oregon's mandatory minimum sentencing structure for "person"​ crimes), and to life or natural life in prison; by acting as a clearing house for lawyers who represent juvenile lifers in state and federal court or pursuing executive clemency; by advocating for the elimination of Measure 11 and life without the possibility of parole sentences for juvenile offenders (in law or de facto) in Oregon. Criminal justice reform: to promote better understanding of and reform of Oregon's criminal justice system Amicus Curiae support: to provide amicus assistance to cases presenting significant social justice issues or of particular concern to communities typically underserved by the legal system Student training: to offer opportunities to students to learn about important issues affecting the criminal justice system, work on cases, and develop skills in investigation, research, and writing. We employ a holistic approach to criminal justice reform, using client-centered and integrative advocacy as our model. This strategy includes focused direct legal services, public awareness campaigns, strategic partnerships, and coordinating our legal and advocacy areas to positively impact outcomes in favor of criminal justice reforms.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-b-moran-center-for-youth-advocacy.jpeg
James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oregon-justice-resource-center.jpeg
Oregon Justice Resource Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Oregon Justice Resource Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oregon Justice Resource Center in 2025.

Incident History — James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Oregon Justice Resource Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oregon Justice Resource Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-b-moran-center-for-youth-advocacy.jpeg
James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oregon-justice-resource-center.jpeg
Oregon Justice Resource Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Oregon Justice Resource Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Oregon Justice Resource Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company.

In the current year, Oregon Justice Resource Center company and James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Oregon Justice Resource Center company nor James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Oregon Justice Resource Center company nor James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Oregon Justice Resource Center company nor James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company nor Oregon Justice Resource Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company nor Oregon Justice Resource Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy company employs more people globally than Oregon Justice Resource Center company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither James B. Moran Center for Youth Advocacy nor Oregon Justice Resource Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X