Comparison Overview

Jaico Publishing House

VS

InsideCounsel

Jaico Publishing House

A-2 Jash Chambers,, 7-A Sir Phirozshah Mehta Road, Fort,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400001
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

ESTABLISHED in 1946, Jaico was India’s first publisher of paperback books in the English language. Jaico is home to world transforming authors such as Robin Sharma, Sadhguru, Osho, The Dalai Lama, Deepak Chopra, Eknath Easwaran, Devdutt Pattanaik, Morgan Housel, John Maxwell, Brian Tracy, and Stephen Hawking. While self-help, religion and philosophy, mind/body/spirit, and business titles form the cornerstone of our non-fiction list, we publish an exciting range of travel, current affairs, biography, and popular science books as well. Our renewed focus on popular fiction is evident in our new titles by a host of fresh young talent from India and abroad. Jaico’s Translations Division translates selected English content into all major regional languages. With its headquarters in Mumbai, Jaico has 7 branches and sales offices in – Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai & regional representatives in Bhopal, Lucknow & Bhubaneshwar.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

InsideCounsel

222 S. Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

InsideCounsel is the award-winning monthly magazine that has been serving general counsel and other top in-house legal professionals for almost two decades. With a BPA-audited circulation of 40,000 and unparalleled depth and breadth of coverage, InsideCounsel provides the strategic tools GCs need to better manage their departments and business risk. Its live and web event programs, custom publishing and robust web/enewsletter offerings provide cost-effective tools and measurement-rich feedback to support demanding business development and marketing program needs.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaico-publishing-house.jpeg
Jaico Publishing House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insidecounsel.jpeg
InsideCounsel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jaico Publishing House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
InsideCounsel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jaico Publishing House in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InsideCounsel in 2025.

Incident History — Jaico Publishing House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jaico Publishing House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — InsideCounsel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InsideCounsel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaico-publishing-house.jpeg
Jaico Publishing House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insidecounsel.jpeg
InsideCounsel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jaico Publishing House company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InsideCounsel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, InsideCounsel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jaico Publishing House company.

In the current year, InsideCounsel company and Jaico Publishing House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither InsideCounsel company nor Jaico Publishing House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither InsideCounsel company nor Jaico Publishing House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither InsideCounsel company nor Jaico Publishing House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jaico Publishing House company nor InsideCounsel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jaico Publishing House company nor InsideCounsel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jaico Publishing House company employs more people globally than InsideCounsel company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jaico Publishing House nor InsideCounsel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.