Comparison Overview

Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust

VS

Wildlife Safari

Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust

Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust, Collections Centre, Gaydon, CV35 0BJ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jaguarheritage.com/

Established in 1983, we are a registered charitable Trust. With a team of employees and volunteers, we work together to bring the legend to life and share the life story of Jaguar and its predecessor companies. Our purpose is to establish, maintain and promote for the benefit of the nation, the permanent preservation of historic archives, artefacts and motor vehicles manufactured and sold by Jaguar Cars Ltd. (now renamed Jaguar Land Rover Ltd.) and its predecessor companies under the marque names of Swallow, SS, Jaguar, Daimler and Lanchester, where such vehicles are of actual potential historic, scientific importance and education value. Our charity registration number is: 286863.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Wildlife Safari

1790 Safari Road, Winston, Oregon, 97496, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wildlifesafari.net

Wildlife Safari is a non-profit AZA accredited zoological park dedicated to conservation, education, and research since its inception in 1972. Wildlife Safari is a fun-filled family destinationwhere you can view over 500 animals in their natural habitat roaming freely much as they do in the wild! Visitors to the park drive through a 4.5 mile trek to see animals from Africa, Asia, and the America's. This unique setting offers many opportunites to get up close and personal with animals large and small.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguardaimlerheritagetrust.jpeg
Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wildlife-safari.jpeg
Wildlife Safari
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wildlife Safari
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wildlife Safari in 2026.

Incident History — Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wildlife Safari (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wildlife Safari cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguardaimlerheritagetrust.jpeg
Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wildlife-safari.jpeg
Wildlife Safari
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wildlife Safari company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wildlife Safari company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company.

In the current year, Wildlife Safari company and Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wildlife Safari company nor Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wildlife Safari company nor Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wildlife Safari company nor Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company nor Wildlife Safari company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company nor Wildlife Safari company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wildlife Safari company employs more people globally than Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jaguar Daimler Heritage Trust nor Wildlife Safari holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References