Comparison Overview

JLR

VS

AutoNation

JLR

Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry, West Midlands, GB, CV3 4LF
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 0 and 549

Every vehicle. Every innovation. Every bit of momentum in over 170 markets worldwide. None of it would be possible without the expertise, drive and continued ambition of our people. We’re proud of our heritage, but it’s our vision for the future that excites us most. Right across our business, everybody plays a crucial role in the ever-evolving JLR journey. And with exciting new products, cutting-edge facilities and continued growth into new markets, there has never been a more exciting time to join us. We may be renowned for our iconic vehicles, but our drive for excellence covers more than premium design and world-class engineering. Ours is a truly global business, with the opportunities to match. You can learn more about our business areas and current opportunities here on the JLR Linked Company pages. This is also the place to ask any questions you may have, share your experiences and talk to the other talented individuals who are thinking about joining us. We look forward to talking with you.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 41,687
Subsidiaries: 58
12-month incidents
17
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

AutoNation

200 SW 1st Avenue, None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, US, 33301
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

As America’s most admired automotive retailer, AutoNation is transforming the automotive industry through its bold leadership, innovation, and comprehensive brand extensions. We are committed to hiring driven, diverse Associates and supporting them in growing their career within AutoNation. We offer paid training, competitive pay & benefits, and a culture that believes in investing in our Associates’ professional futures. With over 300 locations from coast to coast, AutoNation has an opportunity for you. We’ve sold over 14 million vehicles, the first automotive retailer to reach this milestone. Our success is driven by our commitment to delivering an excellent Customer experience through customer-focused sales and service processes. We believe deeply in giving back, and every car we sell helps to raise cancer research and treatment awareness with a Pink Plate. We have proudly raised over $40 million dollars to drive out cancer, create awareness, and support critical research. Join us as we pave the way to moving our company, our communities, and our industry forward. Apply today at a location near you or wherever you dream the road will take you.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 10,534
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-land-rover_1.jpeg
JLR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autonation.jpeg
AutoNation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
JLR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AutoNation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

JLR has 4373.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AutoNation in 2025.

Incident History — JLR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AutoNation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AutoNation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jaguar-land-rover_1.jpeg
JLR
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autonation.jpeg
AutoNation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AutoNation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to JLR company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

JLR company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AutoNation company has not reported any.

In the current year, JLR company has reported more cyber incidents than AutoNation company.

JLR company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AutoNation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JLR company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AutoNation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JLR company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while AutoNation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JLR company nor AutoNation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JLR company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AutoNation company.

JLR company employs more people globally than AutoNation company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither JLR nor AutoNation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H