Comparison Overview

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.

VS

NEXT GAMING LLC

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.

12596 W. Bayaud Ave, Suite 100, Lakewood, CO, US, 80228
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (JEI) is a developer, owner and operator of gaming and entertainment facilities in four regions of the United States. The company’s vision is to develop a strategic and geographically diverse portfolio of gaming, lodging and mixed-use facilities that provide guests with an unrivaled entertainment experience. With more than 2,000 employees and a long-tenured management team, our experience in real estate, gaming development, financing, leasing and operations establishes JEI as a committed industry leader with a reputation for quality. Core to the company’s value is our commitment to ethical leadership, outstanding training, and open employee communication. We are community partners, committed to supporting each jurisdiction in which we work and live.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 269
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

NEXT GAMING LLC

202Fremont St, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Next Gaming is creating skill-based games that can complement and perform well in both skill-based gaming environments or anywhere on the casino floor. With well-known brands from Taito, like Bust-A-Move and Arkanoid, Atari, with Asteroids, Missile Command and Tempest or their own game Z-Force, these arcade-style games appeal to a wide demographic from Baby Boomers to Millennials. Next Gaming differentiates their games by focusing on delivering thrilling entertainment value along with the necessary performance metrics that are required in a casino setting.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobs-entertainment-inc..jpeg
Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NEXT GAMING LLC
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NEXT GAMING LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NEXT GAMING LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NEXT GAMING LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jacobs-entertainment-inc..jpeg
Jacobs Entertainment, Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/next-gaming-llc.jpeg
NEXT GAMING LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NEXT GAMING LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NEXT GAMING LLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, NEXT GAMING LLC company and Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NEXT GAMING LLC company nor Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other NEXT GAMING LLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NEXT GAMING LLC company nor Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company nor NEXT GAMING LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company nor NEXT GAMING LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. company employs more people globally than NEXT GAMING LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. nor NEXT GAMING LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H