Comparison Overview

Jackie Alpers Photography

VS

Mega Pixels Digital

Jackie Alpers Photography

Driftwood Trail, Tucson, Arizona, 85749, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Jackie Alpers is an award winning editorial, advertising and fine-art photographer. She photographs food, lifestyle & social topics for advertising, cookbooks, fiction & non-fiction book jackets, magazine articles, news providers & television shows. She is also an experienced educator who speaks on industry related topics at workshops and universities. Her clients include: Random House, Knopf, Simon & Schuster, The Globe Pequot Press, Canyon Ranch, Loews Hotels, NBC/Universal, Epicurious.com, U.S. News & World Report, AARP Bulletin and The U.S. White House. She is the recipient of numerous awards from American Photography, The Photographer’s Master Cup, The American Assoc. of Media Photographers and the International Photography Awards (Lucie’s). In 2004 she received the the Black & White Spider Award’s, Merit of Excellence, and in 2001 she was awarded a bronze medal from the London Photographic Awards.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mega Pixels Digital

Private Address, Denver, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Located in beautiful Traverse City, MI, Mega Pixels Digital, Inc. brings the world’s best photographic equipment, service, support and training directly to you. MPD Team brings to the table years of experience from working in the commercial photography realm as well as their previous experience with Phase One as Area Sales Managers.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jackie-alpers-photography-food-people-life-art.jpeg
Jackie Alpers Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mega-pixels-digital.jpeg
Mega Pixels Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Jackie Alpers Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mega Pixels Digital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jackie Alpers Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mega Pixels Digital in 2025.

Incident History — Jackie Alpers Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jackie Alpers Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mega Pixels Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mega Pixels Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jackie-alpers-photography-food-people-life-art.jpeg
Jackie Alpers Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mega-pixels-digital.jpeg
Mega Pixels Digital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mega Pixels Digital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jackie Alpers Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mega Pixels Digital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Jackie Alpers Photography company.

In the current year, Mega Pixels Digital company and Jackie Alpers Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mega Pixels Digital company nor Jackie Alpers Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mega Pixels Digital company nor Jackie Alpers Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mega Pixels Digital company nor Jackie Alpers Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography company nor Mega Pixels Digital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography company nor Mega Pixels Digital company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Jackie Alpers Photography nor Mega Pixels Digital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N