Comparison Overview

J. Paul Getty Trust

VS

Masur Museum Of Art

J. Paul Getty Trust

1200 Getty Center Dr, Los Angeles, CA, 90049, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

One of the largest supporters of arts in the world, the J. Paul Getty Trust is an international cultural and philanthropic institution that focuses on the visual arts in all their dimensions. Getty serves both the general public and a wide range of professional communities in Los Angeles and throughout the world. Through the work of the four Getty programs—the Museum, Research Institute, Conservation Institute, and Foundation—the Getty aims to further knowledge and nurture critical seeing through the growth and presentation of its collections and by advancing the understanding and preservation of the world's artistic heritage. The Getty pursues this mission with the conviction that cultural awareness, creativity, and aesthetic enjoyment are essential to a vital and civil society.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 963
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Masur Museum Of Art

1400 S Grand St, Monroe, Louisiana 71202-2012, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Masur Museum Of Art is a fine art museum located at 1400 S Grand St, Monroe, Louisiana, United States. The Masur exists through a partnership between the City of Monroe and the Twin City Art Foundation. The mission of the Masur Museum of Art is to provide a quality visual arts experience through temporary exhibitions, educational activities and programs, and collections management, for the citizens of Monroe and the community of Northeast Louisiana. As the largest visual arts museum in Northeast Louisiana, the Masur Museum of Art strives to support and foster visual arts in the cultural and educational life of the community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j.-paul-getty-trust.jpeg
J. Paul Getty Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/masur-museum-of-art.jpeg
Masur Museum Of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J. Paul Getty Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Masur Museum Of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J. Paul Getty Trust in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Masur Museum Of Art in 2025.

Incident History — J. Paul Getty Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J. Paul Getty Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Masur Museum Of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Masur Museum Of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j.-paul-getty-trust.jpeg
J. Paul Getty Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/masur-museum-of-art.jpeg
Masur Museum Of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

J. Paul Getty Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Masur Museum Of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Masur Museum Of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to J. Paul Getty Trust company.

In the current year, Masur Museum Of Art company and J. Paul Getty Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art company nor J. Paul Getty Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art company nor J. Paul Getty Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Masur Museum Of Art company nor J. Paul Getty Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust company nor Masur Museum Of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust company nor Masur Museum Of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

J. Paul Getty Trust company employs more people globally than Masur Museum Of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Trust nor Masur Museum Of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X