Comparison Overview

J. Paul Getty Museum

VS

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum

J. Paul Getty Museum

US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The J. Paul Getty Museum seeks to further knowledge of the visual arts and to nurture critical seeing by collecting, preserving, exhibiting and interpreting works of art of the highest quality. To fulfill its mission, the Museum continues to develop its collection through purchase and gifts, complementing its impact through special exhibitions, publications, educational programs developed for a wide range of audiences, and a related performing arts program. The Museum strives to provide its visitors with access to the most innovative research in the visual arts while they enjoy a unique experience in viewing works of art at our Getty Center and Getty Villa sites. While benefiting from the broader context of the Getty Trust, the Museum also extends the reach of its mission via the internet and through the regular exchange of works of art, staff, and expertise.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 318
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum

215 Giles Street, Havre de Grace, MD, 21078, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum, Inc. is a public museum organized and operated to collect, document, preserve, and interpret waterfowl decoys as a unique form of folk art that is a distinctive element in the cultural landscape of this region – the Lower Susquehanna River and the Upper Chesapeake Bay. The Decoy Museum will engage and educate visitors with exceptional exhibits that describe the centuries-old history of waterfowling as well as the interplay among this region, its people, the environment, and the folk art of decoy making. By so doing, the Decoy Museum will preserve knowledge of these cultural traditions, encourage comprehensive understanding of the history of decoy folk art, and transmit this rich heritage to future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
J. Paul Getty Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-havre-de-grace-decoy-museum.jpeg
The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J. Paul Getty Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J. Paul Getty Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum in 2025.

Incident History — J. Paul Getty Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J. Paul Getty Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
J. Paul Getty Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-havre-de-grace-decoy-museum.jpeg
The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

J. Paul Getty Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to J. Paul Getty Museum company.

In the current year, The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company and J. Paul Getty Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company nor J. Paul Getty Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company nor J. Paul Getty Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company nor J. Paul Getty Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum company nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum company nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

J. Paul Getty Museum company employs more people globally than The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J. Paul Getty Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X