Comparison Overview

J-Star Motion Corporation

VS

BodyBilt

J-Star Motion Corporation

500 West Street, Cedar Springs, Michigan, 49319, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are an OEM manufacturer of linear actuators and lifting columns, located in the Greater Grand Rapids area! Our parents company, Jiecang Linear Motion Technology Co.,Ltd was established in 2000 in Xinchang, China. Due to their high standards, their products quickly became globally respected for use in medical and home care equipment. With a large customer base in the United States, they found it necessary to purchase a facility locally which happened in 2018.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BodyBilt

One BodyBilt Place, None, Navasota, TX, US, 77868
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

BodyBilt™ strives to create a work environment that is engaged, supportive, comfortable, and motivated. We're obsessed with position. Whether you sit, stand, or lean in between, your position while you work is critical. That's why we've fine-tuned the finer points of ergonomic seating and tools to support your stance. We built on comfortably-contoured seats and superior lumbar support with an array of adjustments and customizations. Combined with our carefully-crafted ergonomic tools, that translates to perfect positioning, whether you spend the day parked or perched in front of your workstation.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j-star-motion-corporation.jpeg
J-Star Motion Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bodybilt.jpeg
BodyBilt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J-Star Motion Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BodyBilt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J-Star Motion Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BodyBilt in 2025.

Incident History — J-Star Motion Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J-Star Motion Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BodyBilt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BodyBilt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j-star-motion-corporation.jpeg
J-Star Motion Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bodybilt.jpeg
BodyBilt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both J-Star Motion Corporation company and BodyBilt company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BodyBilt company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to J-Star Motion Corporation company.

In the current year, BodyBilt company and J-Star Motion Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BodyBilt company nor J-Star Motion Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BodyBilt company nor J-Star Motion Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BodyBilt company nor J-Star Motion Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation company nor BodyBilt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation company nor BodyBilt company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J-Star Motion Corporation nor BodyBilt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.