Comparison Overview

Educational Bootcamp

VS

Stanford LEAD

Educational Bootcamp

10228 NW 50th St, Sunrise, Florida, 33351, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

At Educational Bootcamp, we offer educational games and teacher resources that are fun to play and develop core mathematics & science skills. Our products are an effective intervention for classrooms, small groups, Saturday school, summer school, and everything in between. Our classroom resources are specifically aligned to the State Standards and are proven to increase students’ testing aptitude. We are convinced that when students enjoy their learning experience, they have greater achievement. Our Mission is MAKING LEARNING FUN!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stanford LEAD

655 Knight Way, Stanford, California, 94305, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Transform knowledge into impact and drive innovation in your organization with Stanford LEAD, the flagship online business program offered by Stanford Graduate School of Business. LEAD leverages Stanford Graduate School of Business faculty and curriculum to provide you with the tools and techniques to become a more effective change maker and leader. Join a vibrant community of change makers in this program prepared to learn, engage, accelerate, and disrupt their organizations, industries, and the world. Discover your purpose and maximize your potential with LEAD.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j-&-j-educational-boot-camp.jpeg
Educational Bootcamp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanfordlead.jpeg
Stanford LEAD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Educational Bootcamp
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stanford LEAD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Educational Bootcamp in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford LEAD in 2025.

Incident History — Educational Bootcamp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Educational Bootcamp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stanford LEAD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford LEAD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j-&-j-educational-boot-camp.jpeg
Educational Bootcamp
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanfordlead.jpeg
Stanford LEAD
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: URL Manipulation
Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Educational Bootcamp company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stanford LEAD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stanford LEAD company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Educational Bootcamp company has not reported any.

In the current year, Stanford LEAD company and Educational Bootcamp company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stanford LEAD company nor Educational Bootcamp company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Stanford LEAD company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Educational Bootcamp company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Stanford LEAD company nor Educational Bootcamp company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Educational Bootcamp company nor Stanford LEAD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stanford LEAD company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Educational Bootcamp company.

Stanford LEAD company employs more people globally than Educational Bootcamp company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Educational Bootcamp nor Stanford LEAD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X