Comparison Overview

J&J Printing

VS

Datacord SA

J&J Printing

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jjprintshop.wordpress.com

We are professional graphic design and full spectrum media Resource Company providing all range of print, Screen Printing and Large Format Printing, Business Cards, Brochures, NCR forms, Letterheads, Envelopes, Silk Screen Printing, Signs, Banners, and much more is offered at really fair prices. J&J Printing is “The Place” where truly smart, progressive, value oriented small/large business people from San Fernando Valley with a love for quality and good service not only can get their printing jobs done on time, but find the right solutions for their business challenges when it comes to printing. We are pride ourselves to make customer service and quality our first priority.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Datacord SA

414a Churchill Rd, Kilburn, South Australia, 5084, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.datacord.com.au

Datacord (S.A.) Pty Ltd is an Adelaide based and owned company with over 24 years continuous service to the business community in South Australia. We continue to maintain our existing customers and expand our client base, through excellence in customer service and continually introducing new products to our Digital Colour Copier range. Datacord is the National Key Dealer in Adelaide for sales, IT and service support for Sharp Corporations full range of digital document solutions to major accounts, government departments and small businesses.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&j-printing.jpeg
J&J Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datacord-sa.jpeg
Datacord SA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J&J Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Datacord SA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J&J Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Datacord SA in 2025.

Incident History — J&J Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J&J Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Datacord SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Datacord SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&j-printing.jpeg
J&J Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datacord-sa.jpeg
Datacord SA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

J&J Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Datacord SA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Datacord SA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to J&J Printing company.

In the current year, Datacord SA company and J&J Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Datacord SA company nor J&J Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Datacord SA company nor J&J Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Datacord SA company nor J&J Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J&J Printing company nor Datacord SA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither J&J Printing company nor Datacord SA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

J&J Printing company employs more people globally than Datacord SA company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J&J Printing nor Datacord SA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References