Comparison Overview

J&M Printing

VS

Imageco

J&M Printing

407 Highway 13 East, Gwinner, ND, 58040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Since 1964, J&M Printing has provided local, regional and national clients with quality printing and related services. J&M Printing possesses a philosophy of continued growth, offering existing and new clients alike, the most current communications and print technologies. Much more than a print shop, J&M Printing is a proven one-stop communication center with the ability to offer everything from design, print, signage, and mailing services all under one name. Now, how many other printing companies can say that? At J&M Printing we consciously strive every day to provide excellence in a variety of communication fields. Our experienced staff can help you fine-tune your marketing message while also providing methods of delivering that message. Proving time again that quality is second nature. With over 45 years in the printing business, J&M is the print company you can trust!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Imageco

Britannia House, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS10 2BR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since our inception in 2001 , Imageco Visual Imaging have become one the UK’s leading companies for all things project, print and signage. We are focused on sustainability, recently converting our factory to be powered by solar energy and winners of multiple awards for both our projects and efforts to be more sustainable. We specialise in all sectors of large format exhibition, retail print / display and signage work. With extensive industry knowledge allied to our up to date production facility we aim to supply stunning results, on time, first time, every time. Along with our full in house 3d and graphic design, print and finishing services we also have a full nation wide installation team available 24/7/365. We pride ourselves on our hands on approach and attention to detail, no matter what size the project, so why don’t you give us a call and see how we can help improve your Image!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&m-printing.jpeg
J&M Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imageco.jpeg
Imageco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J&M Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Imageco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J&M Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imageco in 2025.

Incident History — J&M Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J&M Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Imageco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imageco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&m-printing.jpeg
J&M Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imageco.jpeg
Imageco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

J&M Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Imageco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Imageco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to J&M Printing company.

In the current year, Imageco company and J&M Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Imageco company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Imageco company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Imageco company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J&M Printing company nor Imageco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Imageco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to J&M Printing company.

J&M Printing company employs more people globally than Imageco company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor Imageco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N