Comparison Overview

J&M Printing

VS

CJ Graphics Inc.

J&M Printing

407 Highway 13 East, Gwinner, ND, 58040, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jmprint.net

Since 1964, J&M Printing has provided local, regional and national clients with quality printing and related services. J&M Printing possesses a philosophy of continued growth, offering existing and new clients alike, the most current communications and print technologies. Much more than a print shop, J&M Printing is a proven one-stop communication center with the ability to offer everything from design, print, signage, and mailing services all under one name. Now, how many other printing companies can say that? At J&M Printing we consciously strive every day to provide excellence in a variety of communication fields. Our experienced staff can help you fine-tune your marketing message while also providing methods of delivering that message. Proving time again that quality is second nature. With over 45 years in the printing business, J&M is the print company you can trust!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CJ Graphics Inc.

560 Hensall Circle, Mississauga, Ontario, L5A 1Y1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cjgraphics.com

CJ Graphics Inc., enjoys a solid reputation in our community for quality work that reflects our dedication to craftsmanship, partnership and responsibility. CJ Graphics Inc. started as a print brokerage company in Toronto, Canada, in 1981 and began operating its first press at 645 King Street East in 1985. From the beginning, our dedication to excellence has led us to invest in state-of-the-art equipment, to set the highest production standards, and to settle for nothing less than premium results in our finished products. When printed materials go out with your name on them, they become your voice. They are a tangible reminder of you and your message. That’s why it pays to ensure that all your printed materials are designed and crafted to meet your highest standards. At CJ Graphics Inc. we invest in state-of-the-art equipment and offer a broad range of services – in house. Whether your printing job calls for one colour or multi-colour, or whether you need die-cutting, riveting, hand finishing, letterpress printing, electronic prepress, embossing or hot foil stamping, we have the experience and the capabilities, and we will be competitive. In all areas we dedicate ourselves to the highest standards in order to achieve outstanding results.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&m-printing.jpeg
J&M Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c.j.-graphics-inc..jpeg
CJ Graphics Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
J&M Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CJ Graphics Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J&M Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CJ Graphics Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — J&M Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J&M Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CJ Graphics Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CJ Graphics Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/j&m-printing.jpeg
J&M Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/c.j.-graphics-inc..jpeg
CJ Graphics Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

J&M Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CJ Graphics Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CJ Graphics Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to J&M Printing company.

In the current year, CJ Graphics Inc. company and J&M Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CJ Graphics Inc. company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CJ Graphics Inc. company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CJ Graphics Inc. company nor J&M Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither J&M Printing company nor CJ Graphics Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither J&M Printing company nor CJ Graphics Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CJ Graphics Inc. company employs more people globally than J&M Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither J&M Printing nor CJ Graphics Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References