Comparison Overview

Iveco Group

VS

Tenneco

Iveco Group

Via Puglia 35, Torino, 10156, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Iveco Group N.V. (MI: IVG) is the home of unique people and brands that power your business and mission to advance a more sustainable society. The seven brands are each a major force in its specific business: IVECO, a pioneering commercial vehicles brand that designs, manufactures, and markets heavy, medium, and light-duty trucks; FPT Industrial, a global leader in a vast array of advanced powertrain technologies in the agriculture, construction, marine, power generation, and commercial vehicles sectors; IVECO BUS and HEULIEZ, mass-transit and premium bus and coach brands; IDV, for highly specialised defence and civil protection equipment; ASTRA, a leader in large-scale heavy-duty quarry and construction vehicles; and IVECO CAPITAL, the financing arm which supports them all. At 31st December 2023, Iveco Group employed more than 36,000 people around the world and had 20 industrial sites and 31 R&D centres.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 19,679
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tenneco

15701 Technology Dr., Northville, Michigan, 48168, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Driven by our Core Values and our winning mindset, we’re relentless in our pursuit to become the most trusted partner and best manufacturer and distributer to the transportation industry. Our employees are the changemakers of this ambition, bringing drive, passion and dedication to everything we do. And at the center of it all? Our customers – because when they win, we all win.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 26,718
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iveco-group.jpeg
Iveco Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenneco.jpeg
Tenneco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Iveco Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tenneco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iveco Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenneco in 2025.

Incident History — Iveco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iveco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tenneco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenneco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iveco-group.jpeg
Iveco Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenneco.jpeg
Tenneco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tenneco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Iveco Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tenneco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Iveco Group company.

In the current year, Tenneco company and Iveco Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tenneco company nor Iveco Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tenneco company nor Iveco Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tenneco company nor Iveco Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Iveco Group company nor Tenneco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Tenneco company and Iveco Group company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Tenneco company employs more people globally than Iveco Group company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Iveco Group nor Tenneco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N