Comparison Overview

Indiana University Public Policy Institute

VS

Texas Public Charter Schools Association

Indiana University Public Policy Institute

101 W Ohio St, Indianapolis, 46204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://policyinstitute.iu.edu/

The Indiana University Public Policy Institute produces high-quality applied research and data analysis for leaders to effect positive change in their communities. Our faculty, researchers, and analysts partner with community leaders and organizations to deliver unbiased policy guidance and data-driven, expert analysis to help public, private and nonprofit sectors in Indiana and throughout the nation make important decisions that directly impact quality of life. Our expert team can address a wide range of issues and deliver the data and insights needed to make informed decisions. A multidisciplinary institute within the Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs that includes the Center for Health and Justice Research and the Center for Research on Inclusion and Social Policy, our efforts also support the Indiana Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (IACIR).

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Texas Public Charter Schools Association

3005 S Lamar Blvd, Austin, Texas, 78704, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749
http://www.txcharterschools.org

The Texas Public Charter Schools Association (TPCSA) is committed to making sure every child in Texas has access to a high-quality public school that will set them on the path to success. Working toward this vision of the future, our mission is to support and advocate for a policy and regulatory climate that ensures every student in Texas has access to ever-improving public school options. We provide responsive membership support and resources to help schools meet a high bar for academic and financial accountability. And, we ensure that public charter schools have a voice wherever policy decisions are made—at the Texas Education Agency, the Texas Legislature, and the State Board of Education. TPCSA has been recognized as a Best Place for Working Parents and listed in Fortune magazine’s top 100 Best Workplaces in Texas. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram: @TPCSANews

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iu-public-policy-institute.jpeg
Indiana University Public Policy Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-charter-schools-association.jpeg
Texas Public Charter Schools Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Indiana University Public Policy Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Public Charter Schools Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indiana University Public Policy Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Public Charter Schools Association in 2025.

Incident History — Indiana University Public Policy Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indiana University Public Policy Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Public Charter Schools Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Public Charter Schools Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iu-public-policy-institute.jpeg
Indiana University Public Policy Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-charter-schools-association.jpeg
Texas Public Charter Schools Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Indiana University Public Policy Institute company and Texas Public Charter Schools Association company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Texas Public Charter Schools Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Indiana University Public Policy Institute company.

In the current year, Texas Public Charter Schools Association company and Indiana University Public Policy Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association company nor Indiana University Public Policy Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association company nor Indiana University Public Policy Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Texas Public Charter Schools Association company nor Indiana University Public Policy Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute company nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute company nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Texas Public Charter Schools Association company employs more people globally than Indiana University Public Policy Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Indiana University Public Policy Institute nor Texas Public Charter Schools Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References