Comparison Overview

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films

VS

Tamper Technologies Ltd

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films

5 Malcolm Hoyt Drive, Newburyport, Massachusetts, 01915, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

For decades, the world’s leading brands have relied on ITW's metallic, holographic, hot and cold foil products. Similarly, ITW's portfolio of thermal transfer ribbons has long offered capability in a wide array of applications for shipping, date-stamping and traceability. The strength of Illinois Tool Works, the reliability of a globally redundant supply, and a sharpened focus positions ShineMark to lead amidst the growing demands of the packaging, labeling, and coding industries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tamper Technologies Ltd

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Tamper Technologies is a specialist, security label and tape manufacturer with a proven base of expertise in printing, adhesives, silicone release technology and converting, with a rapidly expanding network of approved distributors throughout the world. ISO 9001 2015 approved. Tamper Technologies, is a leading manufacturer of security tamper evident labels and tapes, won the prestigious Queen’s Award for Enterprise 2010 in the International Trade category and the Queen’s Award for Enterprise 2015 for Innovation. TamperTech’s range of security tapes and tamper evident labels add to the security of cartons, crates, polythene bags, packaging and boxes worldwide. Tamper Technologies success as a manufacturer of tamper evident solutions ensures we provide customers with both standard and customer specific solutions depending upon their requirements. We provide a fast turnaround and quality products. TamperTech offer a range of overt and covert security tape and label solutions, please contact us to find out more

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itw-foils.jpeg
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tamper-technologies-limited.jpeg
Tamper Technologies Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tamper Technologies Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tamper Technologies Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tamper Technologies Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tamper Technologies Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itw-foils.jpeg
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tamper-technologies-limited.jpeg
Tamper Technologies Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company and Tamper Technologies Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Tamper Technologies Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company.

In the current year, Tamper Technologies Ltd company and ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor Tamper Technologies Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor Tamper Technologies Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company employs more people globally than Tamper Technologies Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X