Comparison Overview

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films

VS

Kingsdown

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films

5 Malcolm Hoyt Drive, Newburyport, Massachusetts, 01915, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.itwshinemark.com

For decades, the world’s leading brands have relied on ITW's metallic, holographic, hot and cold foil products. Similarly, ITW's portfolio of thermal transfer ribbons has long offered capability in a wide array of applications for shipping, date-stamping and traceability. The strength of Illinois Tool Works, the reliability of a globally redundant supply, and a sharpened focus positions ShineMark to lead amidst the growing demands of the packaging, labeling, and coding industries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Kingsdown

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kingsdown.uk.com

Kingsdown are based in the heart of Bristol but we can look after all your design, print, mailing, fulfilment/ distribution requirements wherever you may be. We offer: Creative design solutions Fast and accurate pre print techniques Top class colour management Consistent print results State of the art finishing technology Pre print to mailing service Skilled and committed staff An environmental philosophy

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itw-foils.jpeg
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kingsdown
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kingsdown
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kingsdown in 2025.

Incident History — ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kingsdown (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kingsdown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itw-foils.jpeg
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kingsdown
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kingsdown company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kingsdown company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company.

In the current year, Kingsdown company and ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kingsdown company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kingsdown company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kingsdown company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor Kingsdown company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor Kingsdown company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company employs more people globally than Kingsdown company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films nor Kingsdown holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References