Comparison Overview

iTEXS LTD

VS

Graphiant

iTEXS LTD

8 The Mill, Cambridge, CB22 3GN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

iTEXS is an IT support company based in Cambridge, we provide Server, PC, laptop and computer support to companies and home workers. From the supply and installation of full networks and servers, to individual upgrades, virus removal, just an Health Check or a fully installed electronic filing system. Whether an on-going monthly support contract or pay-as-you-go - iTEXS has a proven track record for delivering quality services. We can send an engineer to your premises, or you can drop off your computer to our office, either way you will receive a professional service from experienced people.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graphiant

1940 Zanker Rd, 50, San Jose, California, US, 95112
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Graphiant is a Silicon Valley-based provider of next-generation Edge services. Graphiant has developed the Graphiant Network Edge, an “as-a-Service” solution that provides connectivity between the enterprise WAN, hybrid cloud, network edge, customers, and partners. Graphiant’s Network Edge combines MPLS-like performance (guaranteed delivery and privacy) and Internet-class agility to enable network architects to build enterprise-grade networks at the speed of business.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itexs-ltd.jpeg
iTEXS LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphiant.jpeg
Graphiant
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
iTEXS LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graphiant
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iTEXS LTD in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graphiant in 2025.

Incident History — iTEXS LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iTEXS LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graphiant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graphiant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itexs-ltd.jpeg
iTEXS LTD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graphiant.jpeg
Graphiant
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Graphiant company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to iTEXS LTD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Graphiant company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to iTEXS LTD company.

In the current year, Graphiant company and iTEXS LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graphiant company nor iTEXS LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graphiant company nor iTEXS LTD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graphiant company nor iTEXS LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither iTEXS LTD company nor Graphiant company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither iTEXS LTD company nor Graphiant company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Graphiant company employs more people globally than iTEXS LTD company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds HIPAA certification.

Neither iTEXS LTD nor Graphiant holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.