Comparison Overview

iTEDIUM

VS

Sopra Steria

iTEDIUM

BOX 39 Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66201, US
Last Update: 2025-05-02 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

iTEDIUM has been providing quality web-based employee benefits administration service since 2001; integrating proven technology-driven processes and programs into the work streams of the organizations we serve. Our clients represent a wide range of companies and organizations, from small employers to large public entities and third-party administrators. Regardless of an organization’s size, iTEDIUM has a benefit-administration solution to meet their needs: • COBRAGuard® - “The Most Affordable, Efficient and Comprehensive Solution for COBRA Administration” • EESe – “A Benefit Eligibility and Enrollment System that Works” • Harmoney – “Correcting Mistakes Before They Strike Your Bottom Line” • Emeritus – “Built to Help Those Who Helped Build the Future" Our goal is to help employers save time and money and improve service while minimizing risk and liability.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sopra Steria

9 rue de Presbourg, None, Paris, France, FR, 75016
Last Update: 2025-06-20 (UTC)
Between 600 and 649

Sopra Steria, a major Tech player in Europe with 51,000 employees in nearly 30 countries, is recognised for its consulting, digital services and solutions. It helps its clients drive their digital transformation and obtain tangible and sustainable benefits. The Group provides end-to-end solutions to make large companies and organisations more competitive by combining in-depth knowledge of a wide range of business sectors and innovative technologies with a collaborative approach. Sopra Steria places people at the heart of everything it does and is committed to putting digital to work for its clients in order to build a positive future for all. In 2024, the Group generated revenues of €5.8 billion. The world is how we shape it

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 48,718
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itedium.jpeg
iTEDIUM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soprasteria.jpeg
Sopra Steria
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
iTEDIUM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sopra Steria
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iTEDIUM in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Sopra Steria has 63.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — iTEDIUM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iTEDIUM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sopra Steria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sopra Steria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itedium.jpeg
iTEDIUM
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soprasteria.jpeg
Sopra Steria
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Initial Access Broker
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

iTEDIUM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sopra Steria company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sopra Steria company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas iTEDIUM company has not reported any.

In the current year, Sopra Steria company has reported more cyber incidents than iTEDIUM company.

Sopra Steria company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while iTEDIUM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sopra Steria company nor iTEDIUM company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sopra Steria company nor iTEDIUM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither iTEDIUM company nor Sopra Steria company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither iTEDIUM company nor Sopra Steria company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sopra Steria company employs more people globally than iTEDIUM company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds HIPAA certification.

Neither iTEDIUM nor Sopra Steria holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 001, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 004, 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 006, and earlier unsupported releases IBM Business Automation Workflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Deck Mate 2 is distributed with static, hard-coded credentials for the root shell and web user interface, while multiple management services (SSH, HTTP, Telnet, SMB, X11) are enabled by default. If an attacker can reach these interfaces - most often through local or near-local access such as connecting to the USB or Ethernet ports beneath the table - the built-in credentials permit administrative login and full control of the system. Once authenticated, an attacker can access firmware utilities, modify controller software, and establish persistent compromise. Remote attack paths via network, cellular, or telemetry links may exist in specific configurations but generally require additional capabilities or operator error. The vendor reports that USB access has been disabled in current firmware builds.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A potential vulnerability was reported in some Lenovo Tablets that could allow a local authenticated user or application to gain access to sensitive device specific information.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.1.3, under certain circumstances, disclose sensitive user account information (including API keys and hashed passwords) to authenticated users who should not have access to that data. Exposure of API keys or password hashes could lead to account compromise, abuse of API privileges, or offline cracking attempts. CVE-2024-13995 addresses a similar vulnerability with a potentially incomplete fix for the underlying problem in earlier versions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.1.3 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in which an authenticated administrator could leverage the Migrate Server feature to obtain root privileges on the underlying XI host. By abusing the migration workflow, an admin-level attacker could execute actions outside the intended security scope of the application, resulting in full control of the operating system.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X